#1 2011-07-16 10:03:33

Biz's hearing began 5/19/11.  Our esteemed TA declared himself hearing officer to preside over the hearing convened to determined if he took the proper action in firing Biz.

Here's a quote from Biz's lawyer from that hearing, taken from the Standard Times:


"We also want the Board of Selectmen who we hope are all still in attendance ... to pay careful attention to tonight's proceedings because, after hearing the evidence, they may reach the conclusion that ... someone should be fired but it won't be Mrs. Zaleski," said Zaleski's attorney, John J. Clifford. "The town's case can best be described as 'Ready, Fire, Aim.'"

So let's recap.  A hearing began, the person whose decision is under review is the hearing officer.

Biz's attorney basically implied that he intended to bring forth evidence in a public hearing that he believed would prompt the selectmen to fire the TA.

57 days later, here we are, on July 15, that hearing (run by the person whose decision is being reviewed by the hearing) has not yet continued, the evidence that Biz's attorney claims to have has yet to have a public airing.

Obviously, this is being swept under the rug.  Call on the selectmen to demand immediate answers.

Offline

 

Board footer

warehamwater.cruelery.com