WHY IS SAGUINET STILL AROUND, WE WILL HAVE TO ASK THE 2 CANDITATES WE SUUPORT NEXT YEAR DO THEY SUUPORT ANDREWS KEEPING HIS JOB OR NOT ,OUR RANK AND FILE EMPLOYEES BELEAVE HE DOES NOT.

Ham of Peace here.

Two thoughts for Riders of the Peace Train:

1) Yes, I too have noticed that whenever Winslow speaks, Jane and Brenda start barking like "crazed puppies."  Then Bobo the Bagel Biter follows it up by giving her a jeer.  I think she's received 75 jeers now.  If she takes a breath, she gets a jeer.  If she scratches her nose, she gets a jeer.  But you know what Ham says about jeers - wear them all like badges of courage, for if an a-hole doesn't like you, then you must be doing something right.  This is a long used Hypocrite Elite tactic - they try to marginalize people by barking every time they say a work in the hopes they'll just give up.  Winslow is too tough to give up, but Wareham must also get her back.

2)   I think Holmes deserves alot of credit.  His campaign and public speaking skills were a key factor in winning the election, bringing change to Wareham, and ridding the town of Sweet Brucey rule.

He's also no fan of the Ragman, as he has stated publicly.  He even said something the other night about "newspapers playing games" with race, which I thought was a reference to the Bagel Chomper.  Bottomline - anyone who thinks the Ragman is a Big Doofus has Ham's vote.

Holmes did speak out against the moronic mayor plan on town meeting floor.  He was against showing the CRC the door, but he did say during that meeting that it was clear that the public did not want a mayor change, that the CRC needed to abandon that idea, and they needed to make sure they analyzed the charter rationally without holding resentment over their mayor plan being voted down.

Yes, I'd like to see the CRC and Mr. TA shown the door for their shenanigans, but I understand Holmes' reasoning and I believe he is doing what he believes is right, which at the end of the day, is all you can ask of a selectman.

Last edited by Hamatron5000 (2010-06-10 10:16:22)

By: Got Your Back - Bruce Sauvageau

Posted: Wednesday, June 9, 2010 8:10 pm


      That’s why it was so gut-wrenching to witness the ordeal Chief Stanley has been put through the past two months. Yes, he was exonerated from shameless claims that he used a racial slur during an arrest of a suspect, but he should never have been put in that position.
    The claimant recanted his assertions, saying he was put up to it by someone else. He finally confessed, saying he was tired of being used as a tool. A tool for what? For what purpose? To force the town into replacing him? That’s truly frightening.
    Of course it was a tremendous relief to hear Town Counsel exonerate Stanley after an investigation revealed there was no evidence that Stanley ever made such a racist statement. In fact, Stanley wasn’t even present during the arrest. Yet only one day after this complete embarrassment to this community some anonymous bloggers were once again calling for the chief to be replaced.
 

GUT WRENCHING BRUCEY? YET YOU HAD NO PROBLEM CALLING ANOTHER POLICE OFFICER A RACIST IN AN OPEN MTG WITHOUT HESITATION!!!

Here is my issue with Steve, he told us that we were the laughingstock of the Commonwealth and he would see to it that there would be change. Now, suddenly he is "seeing the light" that Jane and Brenda are right? No way! He is too smart for that. He has to know that those two are the reason why we became a laughingstock.

I really want him to stick to his campaign message and turn this mess around. I expect both Steve and Cara to keep true to their word. Now I don't expect that I will always agree with them, but the way I saw it Tuesday night Steve is getting a little too much Brenda 101.

And Brenda, we don't need to you clean up any more "messes" left by previous Boards. You have created enough havoc to keep the next ten Boards busy mopping up your mess.