if the disks have been avaible since jan , then as usual the selectman our liars .

Contacted Wednesday afternoon, Sauvageau first asked the reporter, "Why are you harassing me?" When advised of the reason for the call, Sauvageau responded, "I don't know what the discrepancy is. Last call. No more," he said before hanging up


IT MUST HAVE BEEN TOUGH FOR SAUVAGEAU ACTING LIKE A HUMAN BEING FOR TWO WEEKS, BUT AS SUSPECTED HE'S BACK TO BEING AN ASSHOLE AGAIN.

..."Our attorney has them," selectmen Chairman Bruce Sauvageau said in response to a question about the disks from a colleague Tuesday night.

"They have not yet picked up the disks," Bridget Norton Middleton, spokeswoman for Plymouth County District Attorney Timothy Cruz, said Wednesday. "We've been in contact with them, but no one has come to pick up the disks."

"The disks have been available to them since January," Middleton said. "If they wanted to get them, they knew how to get them."

Contacted Wednesday afternoon, Sauvageau first asked the reporter, "Why are you harassing me?" When advised of the reason for the call, Sauvageau responded, "I don't know what the discrepancy is. Last call. No more," he said before hanging up...

VOTE4CHANGE
TAKEBACKWAREHAM
April 6, 2010
P-SPAN

Wareham selectmen vow to continue computer audit

By Steve Decosta
sdecosta@s-t.com
March 25, 2010 12:00 AM

WAREHAM — Selectmen say the Plymouth County District Attorney's Office has returned the disks the town copied as part of a forensic audit of all town computers, and are promising to continue the investigation they began last May.

But the DA's office said Wednesday that neither the town's counsel nor police chief have picked up the disks as requested.

"Our attorney has them," selectmen Chairman Bruce Sauvageau said in response to a question about the disks from a colleague Tuesday night.

"They have not yet picked up the disks," Bridget Norton Middleton, spokeswoman for Plymouth County District Attorney Timothy Cruz, said Wednesday. "We've been in contact with them, but no one has come to pick up the disks."

"The disks have been available to them since January," Middleton said. "If they wanted to get them, they knew how to get them."

Contacted Wednesday afternoon, Sauvageau first asked the reporter, "Why are you harassing me?" When advised of the reason for the call, Sauvageau responded, "I don't know what the discrepancy is. Last call. No more," he said before hanging up.

On Friday, May 22, with most town employees on a mandated work furlough, a team of computer experts from Global Digital Forensics Inc. copied the hard drives of most town-owned computers.

Others, including those at the Wareham Free Library, Municipal Maintenance Department and sewage treatment plant, were copied shortly thereafter.

After at least two town departments complained, the district attorney's office seized the disks and conducted a grand jury investigation, although the office never revealed what it was looking for on the disks.

In letters to interested parties dated Jan. 13, the DA's office said its grand jury investigation was closed, but, "This matter has been forwarded to the Massachusetts State Ethics Commission and the Office of the Inspector General of the Commonwealth for their review."

Selectman Jane Donahue raised the issue at the conclusion of Tuesday's board meeting, saying, "I'd like the general public to know that we're not done with this audit."

"The board needs to meet and decide what direction we're going to go in," Sauvageau said at the meeting.

"We're not restricted in any way in how to use them. ... We're back where we started, unfortunately, with a nice, slight eight-month delay. In any event, we'll have more to say on that."

Global Digital Forensics of Dunedin, Fla., has billed the town $46,000 for its work through July 31.

The town also was billed $10,103 by town counsel Kopelman & Paige for work related to the audit, and $1,898 by Yunits Associates of Brockton, which represented the town before the grand jury.

The selectmen initially did not announce what they were hoping to find on the computers.

Several months later, at a community forum, Donahue said, "it came to our attention not once, not twice, but many times" that the town computers were being used for "wrongdoing," including viewing pornography, running a home business and shopping online.

The recently released minutes of a May 26 executive session, which the DA's office ruled was improper, listed six reasons:

"GDF scope would consist of who is blogging on town hall computers to Whitehouse site (a Web site often critical of selectmen).
Who is using company time to be on the Internet?
Name search of selectman to see who is investigating them.
Outside business's (sic) being run on town computers.
Double log vs. private log at police station.
Who is performing CORI, DMV, outside searches of selectman and Mr. (George) Coleman, (president of Onset Community Crime Watch)."


Sauvageau has been quoted in another publication that he feels the DA's office is politically motivated in the investigation and the timing of the release of the disks.

Contacted Wednesday morning and asked to comment, Sauvageau said, "I'm not going to talk about that."

THE BOS HAS SPENT OVER 100K OF OUR TAX MONEY TO SEE WHO WAS BLOGGING ON THIS WEBSITE. THEY ARE NOT INTERESTED IN GROWING THE TOWN, BETTER SCHOOLS, BRINGING IN NEW BUSINESS. THEY ARE HELL BENT ON REVENGE AND HATRED AND "GETTING BACK" AT PEOPLE. THEY HAVE SPENT OVER 100K THAT COULD HAVE BEEN USED TO RESTORE LAID OFF EMPLOYEES AND WHAT DO THE BOS HAVE TO SAY ABOUT IT? WE WANT TO CONTINUE WITH THE AUDIT. THEY WANT TO CONTINUE TO SPEND AND SPEND. OVER 100K AND WHAT ARE THE RESULTS? NADA. VOTE THEM OUT AND SAVE OUR TOWN

.

WHAT AN IDIOT.

NORA YOU BEAT ME TO THE PUNCH. WHAT IS GOING ON HERE? BOBO JUST WRITES FICTION IN ORDER TO MAKE A STORY. WHY CANT BRUCEY ANSWER REPORTERS QUESTIONS UNLESS THEIR NAME IS SLAGER? HAS SLAGER PAID HIS 5600 DOLLARS OWED IN BACK RENT LIKE HE PROMISED? HAS HE PAID  HIS BUSINESS STATE FILING FEES? SUCH A TOOL