Rip Dinkle is the MAN!
Rip Dnkle can kick Paul Shooter's ass.
Also onsetdude's ass.

So now our selectmen can get behind any town employee's computer and what---google? Oh I forgot. These elected officials, or in my opinion, idiots, don't know how to google.

This is day to day operations and the bos have no business getting into employee computers. If Brenda can't figure out how to google a new hire, what could she possibly be looking for? Evidence of ragboy's deranged accusations?

If Griswold can't do her job as acting library director she should get the hell out. And if what people say are true, she is never there, it won't be too difficult for her to get out.

I have a question--if she is never in the library--who is REALLY doing all the library work? I mean the day to day operations of the library? The underpaid and overworked staff?? I hope they too are getting an extra $131 a week for their extra work.

Changing the locks. What a slap in the face. If I worked at the library I'd be highly insulted to be treated with such disrespect.

What does Rip mean by "setting traps"? Is this grade school? What traps? Talk about the loony bin.

From the WSJ, October 30, 2009

This little blurb relates to business, but it seemed to me that the same situation might apply at the library.

"The first question to Procter & Gamble....was more concerned with the average employee's state of mind than the firm's margins.

"I just wanted to get some perspective on the mood and psychology within the company. I say that because having experienced my own rather substantial turnaround at UBS over the past few months, I can really start to appreciate when internal psychology turns from one of sheltering and hiding to one proactive...", asked analyst Nik Modi.

P&G chief executive Bob McDonald replied:"...the attitude, the morale is up...we enjoy touching and improving more lives...."

Do you think the BoS will ever 'get it'?

"touching and improving more lives" Sorta like a library can do. if allowed.

marny wrote:

As explained in detail below, the Massachusetts conflict of interest law(3) prohibits all public employees, whether compensated or not, from:

•    using any public resources including staff, facilities, or the state seal or coat of arms, for campaign purposes
•    engaging in any political activities during their normal public working hours

Maybe this should be the "seal" they use..


P-SPAN
TAKEBACKWAREHAM

Last edited by PShooter (2009-11-07 15:26:14)

Molly wrote:

DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM? I am above the law. The NON accredited law school I go to never taught me that I'm supposed to OBEY the law.

More likely learning how to circumvent, delay action..otherwise, manipulate and exploit.
..."black hearted and ugly"

P-SPAN
TAKEBACKWAREHAM

The State needs to step in if this continues. The Selectmen have thrown their support behind Slager a number of times and what he is doing is criminal. The Selectmen should resign before they have to be hauled off by the authorities. It's a shame they don't have better sense than this. I am ashamed of my own town because of the damage THEY (all of them) have done.

Dick,
He really has no idea how much trouble he is in. I hope he looks good in orange. Once a coward, always a coward.

Paula Shooter...that's a good one...
You the man, Dick.

"The Bobo connection"..for what it's worth.

Bobo's known TA candidate, Marshfield's own Michael Maresco, for some time. Why no mention? 

Rob Slager is Editor "Marshfield Reporter" which is owned by the same company that owns the Patriot Ledger.

..."I was disappointed to see you chose not to print the letter I sent in a week ago. We had discussed that you would print it this week.

...At any rate I would be curious to know why you chose not to print it. We felt it was important to keep the discussion current. The citizens seem to not have as many venues available to them as the current administration in Marshfield. I have always felt that editorializing in the free press was a great example of democracy in action. Now I am not so sure.

Maresco and the board care not about truth and justice. You want to pursue your private agenda at the cost of the residents of the Town of Marshfield. Daniel Webster must roll over in his grave everytime the three of you walk by the entrance to Town Hall which boasts his famous words.

Sound familiar?

http://www.marshfieldforums.com/phpBB3/ … ger#p65976

P-SPAN
TAKEBACKWAREHAM

Last edited by PShooter (2009-11-07 20:31:25)

I'll do what I can Larry...but, it may take a few months.
Nice speaking with you. Give my best to your family.

Rip, thanks for the tip.  There should be a law that prevents the mentally insane from working for or running a newspaper.  Sure, insane people can scrub toilets, wash floors, and do other labor without hurting anyone...but lunatics should not be anywhere near a position that involves the public trust like a reporter.

This piece of dogshit belongs in a sanitarium.  He should be in a rubber room, not a newsroom.

Maybe with this ridiculous lie-filled article he is trying to work on some kind of insanity defense.

Last edited by Hamatron5000 (2009-11-07 21:19:02)

Here is a couple facts to chew on for awhile:

Fact: Slager hides his content behind a "pay per view" format.

Fact: Slager only quotes one NAMED source in his scathing nonsense and it is none other than John Donahue.

Fact: If there is an investigation, it will be encumbent on Bobo to produce the names of his sources.

Fact: The intent of this entire episode is a swan song. He is trying to put enough money together to pay his bills when he exits.

Fact: Slager doesn't want to write the news, he wants to be the news.

This is just a big game to him. He doesn't live here, he has no vote and he wants to destroy this town. Wake up folks, he isn't worth the time or effort.

Just like Rip Dinkle said, the man was terminated for fabricating quotes..geez, how credible is that? Enough about him!

We have Selectmen and a Moderator that have thumbed their nose at the citizens of Wareham, let's keep the pressure on them.....why waste anytime on this dork?

It is sad and pathetic that he is now obviously trampling on Mrs. Pillsbury's grave with lies and smears of her good reputation just to turn a fast buck by making this bullshit pay-per-view only.  I don't think many will pay for bullshit though.

Mrs Pillsbury was a good and honest woman and a dedicated public servant.  She had more class and dignity in her pinky finger than that fat miserable slimebag Brucey Bitch Bobo has in his entire prematurely aged cream cheese and gin soaked flabby body.

She deserves better than this.  To treat her like this, with these hateful lies, he only brings shame, embarrassment, and disgrace upon himself.

I repeat - Bobo is lower than the mold that grows on the slime that grows on the scum that grows on a rotting pile of 3 day old rotting in the hot sun dogshit.

In fact, comparing Bobo to dogshit is an insult to dogshit.

Last edited by Hamatron5000 (2009-11-07 23:15:16)

I am HAMATRON5000.

Does anyone have the full interview with the alleged former Library trustee?
If so, please pass it on to me pm or e-mail...thanks.

Bobo the Smelly Piece of Dogshit has earned himself the top spot in the Piece of Shit Hall of Fame for trying to turn a profit off of lying about the library, lying about the trustees, lying about the Friends of the Library, and worse, lying about a deceased longtime town employee and selectman, Mrs. Pillsbury, when she is not even here to defend herself, and never did these things.  How dare he smear and lie about the good reputation of a good woman just to make a buck?  Piece of shit.

I would like to see the interview too, but I refuse to give a cent to that fat sack of donkey shit.  Shamless lying profiteering piece of cow shit.

By the way, if anyone was wondering how low Bobo the Shitbag is - if you were to place Bobo in the middle of a Barnyard Animal Rapist Convention - he would still be the least respectable person in the room.

Last edited by Hamatron5000 (2009-11-08 11:28:18)

I am HAMATRON5000.

It's really simple when you look at it. If he wanted to do good for Wareham, he would giving this info to the police or FBI. To publish it in HIS paper, he is looking to sell papers or online subscriptions. It's that simple. If it was true, it would be in the hands of the authorities. it's not and that is that...


The coward remains a coward...

Ham:
You have addressed a concern that has been on my mind all weekend long, isn't it incumbent upon Mr. Slager to report this knowledge and if the source has had this knowledge and reported it years ago wouldn't the failure be an obstruction of justice or is there no real requirement to report such things?

I thought Chief Stanley, the selectmen's choice, was someone both Bobo and the BOS publicly state they trust.

Why doesn't Bobo go to Chief Stanley tommorrow, give him all his info, and ask Chief Stanley to handle the investigation personally?

Why?  Because he'd then he'd be lying to a police officer and would be tossed in jail where he belongs.

Thanks Ham, I appreciate it!
So basically knowing the information has no reporting madate?
Can anyone explain to me how this could be? And who else knew about it, did the BOS know about this, is that what the computer audit was about? Why didn't they report this to the authorities?
I apologize, but I am just struggling with how the "facts" as presented add up........

Last edited by Cara Winslow (2009-11-08 21:54:26)

This is some far fetched bullshit that if you tried to pitch it to a movie studio they'd turn it down saying it was too far fetched and unbelievable and yet Bobo the Dumbass is such an idiot he thinks people will believe it.  Bobo watches too many movies.

Accept it as NOISE!

Meant to make you forget about...

Westfield and civil service going to the ballot
Dept heads winning the right to unionize
Poor choice for library director
Undecided on TA candidate
Move Wareham Forward charade
Race baiting over Brady meeting
Accountant with no degree
Acting/temporary... Everything
Insurance Trust short 1.8 million
Former accountant lawsuit
Books still not closed for 2009
Tow company suing town and board
Brucies tax problem
Oceanside drive appeal
Swifts Beach eminant domain fiasco
Coleman trial
Computer audit witch hunt

There's more, but you get the picture!

Last edited by commonsense (2009-11-08 22:52:46)

i paid a very brief visit to the Multi-Service Center on Friday.  Topic #1 in everyone's conversation was the article from "THE RAG.  Ditto at Town Hall.  The checker at Shaw's was talking to the bagboy about it.

Noone questioned the authenticity of the news article-the big guessing game was -"Who is involved?"   

It may be fine for us to ignore this whole episode as another crazy BOBO scheme to sell papers, but the rumor mill is working triple overtime.  People haven't read the paper=they have just "heard about it."  Most people do not check this blog to get another viewpoint.

Isn't it time for someone in a responsible position to issue a denial of some sort?  While lawyers may advise silence-some sort of PR is badly needed.