great work!!! i must say the es make me so mad i want to spit cronan says "he will tell them to thier faces" well mark g was before that very same board and cronan several weeks later and he didnt say a word. he did praise him for mowing the little league field which has been rumored cronan called him to do so but no talk of being a RAT!! again great job..

I read in another thread that now Bobo thinks it's a felony to post the audio. Make up your mind Bobo. Was it a public meeting or not? I'll be like you (in this situation). It serves MY agenda, in this circumstance, to view it as a public forum. By taking a consensus (you can listen to it on the audio) of attending citizens, we chose to allow Bobo & the Gang to stay. It then, became a public forum.

Though I'm sure Bobo & the Gang won't believe it, I had never met Mr. Brady before the meeting, and he didn't know I recorded it until days after the meeting (when I contacted him and told him I did it). I am responsible for this recording, and the posting of it. Get your aim straight, dinkwad.

p.s. Bobo, have your speaker from the meeting (whom you claim to be spokesperson for) send me an email and I'll listen to what they have to say. I'll be like you, if I don't like what I hear I'll just ignore it.
PShooter(Not Bobo's Buddy)

Last edited by PShooter (2009-08-13 03:33:13)

I'll try to be a little more civil in this post:

Mr. Slager,
This dialogue will be entirely done (on my part), through this thread. I will post each of your email's here.

Email I rec'd @ 6 pm from Mr. Slager,

"Nope. We're not done. The selectmen never called their meeting to order, which means it wasn't an official meeting. Mr. Brady can be clearly heard during the meeting saying he had the right to decide who can attend, which cannot occur during a public meeting. I happen to agree with you on one point, however. I considered it a public meeting. But if that's the case, Mr. Brady violated the civil rights of those he denied entry into the meeting. You and Mr. Brady can't have it both ways. Either he violated the civil rights of local residents or you illegally recorded and posted a private meeting. So which is it?

Robert Slager"


Mr. Slager,
First of all, I thought you wanted my email so one of the speakers could contact me. Whatever. Bob Brady's views on whether he believes the meeting was public or not is of no concern to me. THEY ARE HIS VIEWS. I, as I said before, believe it essentially "became" a public meeting once a general consensus of those gathered chose to allow you and the BOS to remain. I mean, you're a little ridiculous. Public/private...is there legal recourse??? If you have anything to go on, run with it. Otherwise, it's just fodder for your "newspaper/blog". Also, you write in your email"...The selectmen never called their meeting to order, which means it wasn't an official meeting." Is this an admission that they broke the open meeting law? Once the decision was made to allow "uninvited guests" to remain, I believe anyone who bothered to try, would have gained admission. The ITA left. I think if he was worth his salt he would have stuck around and seen if he'd be able to get in after the dust settled. He obviously had the time, he planned on attending the meeting, right? 

PShooter(proud member of "powerelitehatebloggerdictatorialthoughtpolice")

Last edited by PShooter (2009-08-13 16:42:13)

Email I rec'd from Mr. Slager @ 6:50 pm

"No. It means there was never any meeting at all. You can't violate open meeting law when a meeting was never called to order.
    What makes you beleive an audience can decide whether the meeting was public or private? Brady said many times the meeting was private. I have copies of e-mails in which he said it to other people. He made numerous statements to the media in which he said he had the authority to decide who could attend. Clearly in his mind it wasn't a public meeting, and he was the host.
    My position was, and still is, that he didn't have the authority to make that decision. That's why it was a public meeting. The only reason people were allowed to stay is because the police declined to remove them. It had nothing to do with Brady. The vote you speak of wasn't whether to allow us to stay. It was made pretty clear we weren't going to leave. The vote was whether to continue the meeting or to rescheduled it.
   So, once again, either it was a public meeting or it was a private meeting. You believe it was a public meeting. If proven so, you have not violated any laws, so all this shouldn't be of concern.
    May I ask your name, please, so that I can include your viewpoint in a story I'm preparing? Thank you.

Robert Slager"

Ok then, Mr. Slager, I Do believe he had the authority to call a private meeting, and You & the others circumvented that authority. I don't feel you took any momentous stand. I believe you disrupted a group of concerned citizens of wareham who are unhappy with their leadership, and your paper/blog. Obviously, if I wanted you to know my name, you'd already have it. I wouldn't concern myself too much about that. I don't fit any of the labels you've given those who converse here. I am not "power elite", not CBW, not even a "hateblogger". I just have opposing views to yours', and the leadership of Wareham.

PShooter(Not having alot of fun right now)

Last edited by PShooter (2009-08-13 16:48:19)

Try this; tell bobo to put up or shut up. He should drop a load of money on his shitty lawyers desk and sue for whatever law he thinks was broken!

I'll bet slagers not that confident, but he'll whine like a little bitch, as usual, and claim some law or right was broken....with zero follow up. Sounds like a sweet brucie tactic doesn't it.

Save you stupid retoric for the idiots that believe you slager. Or lawyer up and prove it if your so confident.

A reporter that attacks citizens... Where will end bob?

Does WCTV get "model releases" and "hold harmless" from everyone at a BOS or other meetings they cover?
How many times a day do you think you are video recorded or audio recorded wherever you may go?
Security cameras? Audio attached?
We on Earth understand this, strange persons.

Courier: Wareham residents gather to discuss Town Meeting articles

PShooter
TAKEBACKWAREHAM