A perfect example is a letter that local resident Michael Schneider sent to both the Observer and the Courier. Schneider offered his critical viewpoint on Brady’s “community” meeting. That was his absolute right. That is what freedom of speech means. Of course he was brutally attacked for it. He was called a pansy and a liar. Bob Brady even admitted to personally contacting Mr. Schneider after the letter appeared. Apparently nobody is ever allowed to disagree with Brady or the Citizens for a Better Wareham.

Mr Brady reached out to schneider and offered to sit down with him over coffee and discuss the issues. You won't read that in Bobo's paper. You'll only read that he contacted this person. The implication is that he was harrassing him. I think it was a noble gesture to reach out to a person is is clearly does not share Mr. Brady's view and offer to discuss it with him.

After attacking anyone on this site about how they won't reach out and have meaningful dialogue, it's clear that when it has happened, it was met with an attack. Wait? Isn't that what the posters on this site were accused of?

The good news is that fewer and fewer people read his nonsense. Frankly, I am really tired of this non-resident writing half truths and then filling in the rest with lies or omitting full explanations.

For now, I think I will just shake my head and move forward with the Take Back Wareham effort. So many people see what is really happening in this town and want change.