#1 2009-09-09 15:03:15
Just Posted by the Charter Review Committee along with some other stuff (still no update on the minutes, though):
PREPARING THE RECOMMENDATION:
This is the last in a series of four informational pieces about the work so far of the Charter Review Committee. If you’ve missed any of the earlier articles, they can be found on the town website www.wareham.ma.us or can be picked up at the Clerk’s office in Town Hall or at the Library.
In our last article we explained how our preference for a form of government with a town council and mayor came about. Let us review the situation that led us here:
Wanting a legislative body that 1) could represent a greater % of the citizenry than the present town meeting and 2) would meet continually throughout the year, we saw that a representative town council would achieve both goals; better representation, and a body that can take the time to study and debate issues in Wareham needing to be resolved AND be able to address issues as they arise, rather than but once or twice a year.
In any town having a town council, by Massachusetts law, the executive branch must be either an appointed Town Manager, a Mayor chosen by the Council, or an elected Mayor.
Wanting full accountability from our executive branch (and welcoming the elimination of the present confusion re Board of Selectmen and Town Administrator about overall administration versus day-to-day administration) we saw that we could have full accountability in an elected full time executive, a mayor, whose ongoing task would be to oversee the administration of the town and be responsible to the voters.
In researching other towns that have moved from a town meeting form of government to a government consisting of a town council and a mayor, we noted that their Charters, although similar, also exhibited differences: differences of, for example, terms of office, how vacancies are handled, compensation of officials, eligibility for office, some duties of council members, and citizen initiative measures.
If we adopt this system, we learned, there are certain rules that must be followed as well as allowing us great variation to fit our particular town.
For example, the number of council members is determined by the number of town precincts; a town, such as Wareham, having seven or fewer precincts must have an eleven-member council. We, therefore, would vote for a representative from each of our six precincts plus vote for 5 members at large.
Some examples of other decisions regulated by the Plan are the following:
The Town Clerk is appointed by the Council
The School Committee is to be elected.
The Council cannot exercise any executive power and the Mayor cannot exercise any legislative power.
The Mayor can veto some ordinances created by the Council, and the Council can override that veto with a 2/3 affirmative vote.
The Committee began, Article by Article and Section by Section, to write a new Charter for Wareham. The first draft was, and each subsequent draft will be, submitted to a Kopelman and Paige attorney for review:
to ensure that we changed nothing that could not be changed,
to alert us to ambiguous or confusing language,
to point out any possible untoward consequences of alternatives we proposed,
and to offer general guidance from the attorney’s extensive experience with other town committees rewriting their Charters.
At this writing, we have completed a second draft of Articles 1-3. Article 1 of the Charter deals with definitions, the broad form of the government, and the division of powers.
Article 2 addresses the legislative branch: composition of the Council, terms of office, eligibility of candidates, powers and duties, compensation, and vacancies. Article 3 addresses these same concerns as regards the executive branch.
Subsequent Articles will address the School Department, Citizen Initiatives, and Transitional Provisions, i.e. rules for moving from our present form of government to a new one. Other Articles may or may not be included in regard to other departments, the Library, and the Board of Assessors.
In a town meeting form of government, the town operates under by-laws; under a town council form of government the town operates under ordinances.
During a transitional period, when a town changes from a town meeting to a town council form of government, the town functions under the existing by-laws (so long as they are not in conflict with the new Charter), and one of the first tasks of the new council is to decide which of the old by-laws will be carried over “as is” to ordinances and which will be rewritten. For this reason, you will see no rules and regulations, other than those mentioned above, in the new Charter.
As the work continues, you are invited to ask questions and to make comments and suggestions, either through the town website where a write-in mechanism is being set up or at either the Town Hall or the Library, where a Charter Review “Comment Box” is being placed.
With this information from you, beginning with the week of September 21 and twice monthly after that, we will have a column in the Wareham Courier and Wareham Observer in which to respond to your views and concerns and answer your questions, whether they are about clarification of Charter content or explanation of Committee thinking and reasoning. We are sure you will have questions about both the broad plan to change our form of government and the specifics of the new form. This column will also be reproduced on the town website.
As we continue, the work in progress can be seen on the town website.; but you will not be looking at a final draft until, after we have heard and taken into consideration your views, the Committee takes a final vote and we’ve gotten attorney validation that the new Charter conforms to regulation.
In addition, there will other opportunities to learn more and to have a voice. Near the end of September or in early October, some members of the Committee will appear on Paul Ciccotelli’s morning program on WCTV (8-10) to talk about the proposed recommendation. Other public events will be announced both on the website and through the papers. The Charter Review Committee meets the 2nd and 4th Thursday of the month at 6 PM, Multi-Service Center, to which the public is always welcome.
CharterReview
PShooter
Offline
#2 2009-09-09 15:27:52
AHHH...Let me think...UMMM...I can't find the right word or words...UMMMM...Oh yeah, I have it:
BULLSHIT!
Offline
#3 2009-09-09 15:33:29
here is the COMMENT link for the charter review comm...
www.wareham.ma.us/Public_Documents/Ware … cs/contact
Offline
#4 2009-09-09 16:29:13
Do you suppose they would be offended if I wrote and told them they were all a bunch of shills appointed by a bunch on incompetent assholes and then wrote in bold letters: BULLSHIT?
I wouldn't want to offend anyone.
Offline
#5 2009-09-10 14:11:11
Does Wareham's Charter say anything about the frequency of BOS meetings?
I thought we elected these clowns to attend to the town's business once a week.
Offline
#6 2009-09-10 14:38:01
all i found was they the bos will hold regular meetings..
Offline
#7 2009-09-10 15:26:44
I'd like to see some evidence that they did what they were charged to do: review the charter, line by line , with thoughtful commentary in the style of "commonsense" for each item.
Then I'd like to see a rational argument in defense of their conclusion that even with updating and revisions to the charter, and even with strong, fully qualified professionals in charge, our present form of government is unworkable.
The next thing I would want to see is that they considered both of the other two forms of government before making their recommendation.
The way they have gone about it gives new meaning to the term, "railroading". If there's any way of preventing this travesty from getting to the Town Meeting we should make that effort.
I've said this before, but it bears repeating: These folks are using the old car salesman trick of going right from the sales pitch to the question:"What color would you like?", without ever asking the customer if he wants to buy the car. Make that tough decision for him, the way the CRC have relieved all of us of the difficult task they have taken on in our behalf.
Offline
#8 2009-09-10 15:56:36
The Committee began, Article by Article and Section by Section, to write a new Charter for Wareham. The first draft was, and each subsequent draft will be, submitted to a Kopelman and Paige attorney for review:
to ensure that we changed nothing that could not be changed,
to alert us to ambiguous or confusing language,
to point out any possible untoward consequences of alternatives we proposed,
and to offer general guidance from the attorney’s extensive experience with other town committees rewriting their Charters.
Sorry--editing to add my comments. The above quote are the words of the CRC.
Here is my question--HOW MUCH IS THIS GOING TO COST US IF KOPELMAN AND PAIGE ARE GOING OVER THIS WITH A FINE TOOTH COMB? OR ARTICLE BY ARTICLE?
Last edited by Molly (2009-09-10 16:48:04)
Offline
#9 2009-09-10 17:57:50
Molly: Thanks for that info. It looks as if their butts are covered with respect to that concern, and I'll feel even better about their work if you can tell me that they gave a full and fair airing of the pros and cons of the Representational Town Meeting option.
Another question for Molly or anyone: How viable is their apparent plan to by-pass the elected commission that I had been led to believe was as if carved in stone?
I look forward to the promised in-the -flesh gatherings in which the considerable knowledge that this site has attracted can be shared with all.
Offline
#10 2009-09-10 18:08:14
Dick Wheeler wrote:
Molly: Thanks for that info. It looks as if their butts are covered with respect to that concern, and I'll feel even better about their work if you can tell me that they gave a full and fair airing of the pros and cons of the Representational Town Meeting option.
Another question for Molly or anyone: How viable is their apparent plan to by-pass the elected commission that I had been led to believe was as if carved in stone?
Dick,
I believe their intention is; if/when the Change in Gov't is shot down at next April's Town Mtg., they'll immediately act to form an elected Charter Commission. That process has it's own requirements, and may or may not work out for them. Wasted time and effort (& $$$), is nothing new for them.
PShooter
Offline
#11 2009-09-10 19:06:29
They can think about and start whatever they like.
In April of 2010 there will be two new Selectmen.
All of their "future" plans will be negated.
Offline
#12 2009-09-10 19:17:17
Dick Wheeler wrote:
Molly: Thanks for that info. It looks as if their butts are covered with respect to that concern, and I'll feel even better about their work if you can tell me that they gave a full and fair airing of the pros and cons of the Representational Town Meeting option.
Another question for Molly or anyone: How viable is their apparent plan to by-pass the elected commission that I had been led to believe was as if carved in stone?
I look forward to the promised in-the -flesh gatherings in which the considerable knowledge that this site has attracted can be shared with all.
LAUREN FROM K&P AND BRENDA E FROM THE BOS are helping(instructioning) the crc as to what the charter should read.. there are 2 ways to get this passed 1 member of the crc asked if plan 1 is voted down then the people have spoken and that it.. the chairman of the crc replied NO then we go to plan b and it gets passed with 15% of the registered voters and approval of the ago office...
Offline
#13 2009-09-10 20:38:30
Yeah, and that means an election.
And they lose!
Offline
#14 2009-09-11 08:04:24
Do we all remember when the bos "quickly" rewrote the personnel plan to try to push it through? The thing was a mess--filled with typos, sections missing, grammatical errors so that some sentences didn't even make sense. But they were in a hurry because they had heard about the department heads speaking to the Steelworkers. The committee to revise the personnel plan was dysfunctional. It took two nights of town meeting with multiple versions---like I said--a real mess.
Now, according to Liz, we have Lauren from K and P and Brenda basically writing this thing. Sounds like another snow job from our bos. When are we going to stop these people from dictating how our town will be run?
We can start with town meeting and then look to the April elections. We can start by educating the voters to what has been happening. We can start by working together towards this common goal. I enjoy this blog---but the time for words is over. Now it is the time for ACTION.
Offline
#15 2009-09-11 08:31:40
Molly wrote:
Now, according to Liz, we have Lauren from K and P and Brenda basically writing this thing. Sounds like another snow job from our bos. When are we going to stop these people from dictating how our town will be run?
We can start with town meeting and then look to the April elections. We can start by educating the voters to what has been happening. We can start by working together towards this common goal. I enjoy this blog---but the time for words is over. Now it is the time for ACTION.
1. jane d has also been a part of the crc meetings also...
2. i know someone who resigned from the personel board because of the lack of professionalism ie having regular meeting, keeping full minutes..
Offline
#16 2009-09-11 09:08:32
Molly wrote:
we have Lauren from K and P and Brenda basically writing this thing. Sounds like another snow job from our bos. When are we going to stop these people from dictating how our town will be run?
We can start with town meeting and then look to the April elections. We can start by educating the voters to what has been happening. We can start by working together towards this common goal. I enjoy this blog---but the time for words is over. Now it is the time for ACTION.
True that, Molly. I would add that we should go to the comments area and express our discontent over the process, at the area they finally put up for that.
The meeting minutes show Brenda's & K&P's Lauren's, involvement in the process. Not that they shouldn't have some involvement. There needs to be a BOS liason, and counsel. But, I consider Brenda's/BOS influence in the direction the CRC decided to take, more than just an "advisory" role. They try to establish, and make it seem as though they seek out "public input" & "citizen participation", but their "outreach" has been spotty, at best.
Send them a message, whether you disagree or not, then they can't claim support, even though nobody paid attention whilst they dramatically altered our town.
Charter Review Comments and Questions
PShooter
Last edited by PShooter (2009-09-11 09:09:00)
Offline