Tammy the Faker (how's that make-up?) wrote on 7/31:

"The Wareham Courier did not send a reporter, PER SE (My emphasis). But a senior editor from the newspaper group (who could it be, now?), who is a Wareham resident, PLANNED (sic) to attend and volunteered to go to listen and observe."

further: "The Standard Times reporter and photographer HONORED (my emphasis) Brady's request by staying outside the meeting room..."

Well, well well. So, the local weekly got down on the same level as the obfuscator, thru the use of subterfuge. Their ploy was to gain access to the meeting using not the usual suspects, but an editor who happened to be  "planning to attend the meeting". Or, was she?

When I first read this passage, my reaction was anger and outrage that an organization which holds itself out as ethical, moral and responsible  could resort to such trickery. But, no one seemed to take umbrage at this tomfoolery, so kiss it off. That was then.....

August 3: Tammy the Faker seems to have joined the "I"team in her latest apologia. In that, most sentances and paragraphs begin with the self-absorbed one-letter word. Growing up, it was drilled into students that it was best to AVOID that kind of emphasis on the "I". Tammy the Faker must have been absent that day.

..." Smith, asked me if I planned to attend that evening's Take Back Wareham meeting........But once reminded of the meeting, I knew my plans had changed......But we intended to honor the request (i.e. the ban on the media), so unless I was there as a concerned resident, the Courier staff would have no idea what actually transpired."

Well, well, well. It appears from this excerpt, that Tammy the Faker was NOT "planning to attend, and with good reason, as she had been sick. So, a scheme was hatched to slime around the request of Mr. Brady that this meeting be free of the media. And, this narrative, in her own words, confirms Mr. Brady's thoughts on the subject.

Two thoughts leap to mind:

1. Where and for whom did the obfuscator work prior to his giving the Cat lady the well-deserved shaft? Why, he is a proud graduate of the Courier School for Slimeball Journalism. Guess he got rejected at Columbia, along with Tammy the Faker. Ah, They must beam with pride at his malaprops, misspellings and mendaucity.

2. "The state of Wareham's government has been extensively reported in the Courier. (Say, What!!!!!)But the reaction of the those in attendance to the state of Wareham's government was certainly a surprise."

Holy shit, Batman! The citizens are revolting! Yes, Robin, and they are fomenting a revolution.

does Tammy the Faker really expect people to accept that the she was so deep in the dark about this? Now, to be fair (not that the Courier ever was to me when they fucked up - and boy did they ever-, but we Libras are balanced, eh?), the rest of that paragraph (ignoring the plethora of "I's"), is an attempt to capture what this blog has seen all along. About time, Tammy the Faker. About time. (watch that make-up!)

So. When we all growl, hiss and carp about the obsuscator, just remember where he came from. These two articles clearly show that he is the evil spawn of the the Courier culture. Great work, Tammy the Faker, you nurtured a real piece of Shit. But then, the apple didn't fall from its tree, now did it?