SO  BAGEL MAN HAS A CHOICE GO HOME TO MY LOVING WIFE LIZA 45 MIN FROM TOWN HALL AND A HOME COOKED MEAL OR GO 10 MINS TO HIS OFFICE IN BUZZARDS BAY,  AND EAT BAGELS AND BLOG ON THE COMPUTOR , I KNOW WHAT I WOULD DO , THERE IS NO CHOICE , HOME COOKED MEAL AND A KISS FROM LIZA  OR BAGELS AT THE OFFICE, I WOULD GO HOME.  BUT HE PROBALY DOESNT HAVE THIS CHOICE,   AND HIS CAR HAS BEEN PARKED OUT SIDE HIS OFFICE FOR MONTHES NOW,   HOLY CRAP THERE IS A MELTDOWN IN TOWN COLEMAN HIT A WOMAN WITH A TOWN CAR,  I HOPE SLAGER OR BRUCE DOESNT HAVE  A MELTDOWN NEXT?

Last edited by ihateliz (2009-07-17 15:13:43)

I would think that owning an LLC, you'd want to have as many write-offs as possible. I believe travel to and from "work" would be one of them.

What time is being saved? Bobo is not CNN with 24 hour news.

A warm bed, a good woman, and a shower... Yeah, I'd pass that up to copy other newspapers and blog watch. (that's sarcasm bobo)

IHATELIZ...If you can't read the updated version of your current "jeer" in yesterdays Observer, just let me know and I will post it here so you can...

I still prefer SlagisDB..I see i've been joined by Savage Joes a DB, then we can throw in George Coleman..three total douche-bags!!

Hey ILIAZ...It seems like it's been a while...

I would really be disappointed if you were jeered...your intentions have always seem honorable...just come from the opposite direction of mine...

I logged off the observer site and you can still read Ihateliz's updated jeer...just click the "commentary" button on the top menu bar...if you can't, I'll copy and paste it...the ones you can't see are Bruce's and Bills...

SLAGER THE LIEING BAGEL BITER CREEM CHEESE EATER , HE IS A LIAR , A  TAX CHEAT,A  FAT BASTARD , UGLY AS SIN ,AND EATS SO MANY BAGELS ,THAT THERE IS A BAGEL SHORTAGE IN TOWN,  ALSO WHERE IS HOORAY OR SHOULD I SAY SLAGER.

Last edited by ihateliz (2009-07-18 07:58:47)

This was supposed to be in bold but I am unable to edit my own posts (I do make error, Bill, so it would be nice to be able to correct them without posting another message):

What with the Coleman incident and already mistake number one, the poor handling of it by the police chief  by his not giving a statement (as he would have in any other town)....

Directions Details
Click to restore avoided maneuvers
[2843-2855] Cranberry Hwy
Wareham, MA  02571 Edit
Remove

Move Up
Move Down

Online Offers: Motels in WarehamWareham RestaurantsMassachusetts Auto Insurance  Directions from A to B:
1:  Start out going NORTHWEST on CRANBERRY HWY/ US-6 W/ MA-28 N toward SANDWICH RD. Continue to follow CRANBERRY HWY/ MA-28 N.  0.3 mi Map


2:  Turn SLIGHT RIGHT onto MAPLE SPRINGS RD.  0.4 mi MapAvoid


3:  Merge onto MA-25 W toward I-195/ PROVIDENCE/ I-495/ BOSTON.  5.4 mi MapAvoid


4:  Take the RT-58 N exit, EXIT 2, toward CARVER/ PLYMOUTH.  0.3 mi MapAvoid


5:  Turn SLIGHT RIGHT onto MA-58.  2.3 mi MapAvoid


6:  Turn LEFT onto MA-58 N/ S MAIN ST. Continue to follow S MAIN ST.  12.0 mi MapAvoid


7:  Turn LEFT onto MA-106/ COUNTY RD. Continue to follow MA-106.  1.5 mi MapAvoid


8:  Turn RIGHT onto HOLMES ST/ MA-36.  0.9 mi MapAvoid


9:  Turn LEFT onto TWIN LAKES DR.  0.3 mi MapAvoid


10:  End at [1-699] TWIN LAKES DR.  0.0 mi Map




[1-699] Twin Lakes Dr
Halifax, MA  02338 Edit
Remove

Move Up
Move Down

Online Offers: Motels in HalifaxHalifax RestaurantsMassachusetts Auto InsuranceTotal Travel Estimates: Time: 37 minutes    Distance: 23.33 miles    Fuel Cost: Calculate
Add Another Location Find a Business (optional)
Location (Address, City, State and/or ZIP)
  Add Location


NOTICE THE TRAVEL TIME AT THE END 37 MINUTES!!!!!!!!!!!!! ITS 23.33 MILES. NOW HERES WHAT SLAGER SAYS. ALWAYS THE KING OF EXAGGERATION.


    IHATELIZ - Is it difficult going through life as both a complete idiot and a liar, Mr. P? I’m not living in the office. My wife didn’t throw me out. My kids have been spending several days a week at their grandparent’s house during the summer so I’ve slept in Wareham a few times instead of driving all the way home to Halifax at night after selectmen meetings (Tuesdays) and deadline nights (Wednesday). It saved a little time (it takes about an hour and a half round trip) and a little gas. My wife would have already been asleep by the time I got there and would have left for work before I woke up. So I decided to use that extra time to catch a little more sleep (I have a shower at the office).
   My goodness, IHATELIZ. You are one seriously moronic, delusional and hateful human being. And that goes double for your psycho stalker son IHATESLAGER. How did you even know I slept here a few times? Do you have a son who is a Wareham police officer checking on me when he makes the rounds? That's just creepy.

Read More ...


WHY ARE YOU GETTING SO ANGRY ABOUT THIS RAGBOY? GOT CAUGHT? 37 MINUTES TO BE HOME IN BED DOESNT SEEM LIKE A LOT TO ME? AGAIN YOUR A LIAR AND EVERYONE KNOWS IT. I GUESS YOUR LAWYER WILL BE BUSY

urneighbor wrote:

This was supposed to be in bold but I am unable to edit my own posts (I do make error, Bill, so it would be nice to be able to correct them without posting another message):

I wondered when that subject would surface. Wareham has no other public record to speak up and I was troubled to find folks wandering back here weeks and sometimes months after the fact to scrub their previous posts.

There's no way to distinguish between editing for clarity and purging.

urneighbor wrote:

I read this twice and still wouldn't be surprised if there's an error.

Yuh, welcome to the club. English is my second language.

Firing a town official for expressing a PERSONAL opinion might be grounds for civil action. This is still America and we have rights to express opinions no matter who we work for.

I don't think the issue was with the personal opinion, but that the personal opinion was stated on official letterhead...admin requested that any press releases on anything marked with an official town seal needed prior approval before they could be released for publication. I don't think having the chief comment on an ongoing investigation falls under the realm of that situation...

I suppose if the chief had wanted to walk down Main Street professing anything he wanted through a bullhorn, he could have, as long as the bullhorn wasn't department issued...and I would have offered a small bit of advise if he had planned to make his proclomations while walking down Onset's main drag...that if he saw that Crime Watch Crown Vic heading in his direction, he should run as fast as he can and take cover...

MsLilly wrote:

Firing a town official for expressing a PERSONAL opinion might be grounds for civil action. This is still America and we have rights to express opinions no matter who we work for.

I don't think the issue was with the personal opinion, but that the personal opinion was stated on official letterhead...admin requested that any press releases on anything marked with an official town seal needed prior approval before they could be released for publication. I don't think having the chief comment on an ongoing investigation falls under the realm of that situation...

Just like everyone else, they have fooled you too.  No such policy has been implemented in the Town of Wareham.  The ITA said at a selectmen's meeting that he was "thinking of" instituting a policy.... he never followed through.

Most police departments have a few spokespersons to issue statements to the media. A few police departments even allow the officer who handled the sitution to be interviewed, the state police do that all the time. Wareham police have always been tight lipped but they give out even less information since they suspended the former chief for his press release.

Last edited by TBL (2009-07-18 10:41:41)

MsLilly wrote:

Then where are all the complaints coming from that suggests the town administration is controlling what can and cannot be said?  Criticism for a policy that doesn't exist?

Well, Ms. Lilly, I would suppose that if Chief Joyce was suspended for issuing a press release WITHOUT a policy in effect, Wallace is erring on the side of caution.

Hamatron5000 wrote:

Ms Lilly, you seem to be doing alot of posting work for Ragman lately.  Are you working for him now?  Does he pay well?

Yes Ham....all the bagels I can eat...

I don't think the reason for the suspension was ever public record.

YEAH THIS THREAD IS ABOUT BOBO LIVING IN HIS OFFICE AND HIS POOR EXCUSE ON WHY HE DOESNT GO HOME!

commonsense wrote:

What does it matter?

commonsense should tell you that when a responder answers a question with a question, they either do not care enough to know the truthful answer or they do and don't like it...you're right, nuff said....

As I recall, the Chief was suspended for insubordination because he wrote a letter to the editor in defense of one of his officers, Lt. Bliss.  Or in other words, the BOS want the power to trash all town employees, while taking away the power of the employees to publicly defend themselves, or in this case, the power of a superior to defend one of his employees.

The timing of the suspension seemed odd, coming quite awhile after the letter was published, leading many to believe it was more of a rouse to get him out of the office so the anti-blogger SWAT team could roll in and paw through all the police files.

I never believed that was why Joyce was suspended.   I don't think they ever said why.   Plus didn't they find out he was NOT a strong Chief?  I remember reading something about his contract should have been renewed every three years.  But no one knew the rules so he just kept going and going. The rules had been changed in 1929 or something like that.

PINK PANTHER EITHER KEEP UP OR GET OFF THE BLOGS.

TO YOUR QUESTION OF WHETHER OR NOT WAREHAM HAS A STRONG CHIEF. BROCKTON BRENDA IN HER ROLE AS LEGAL ANALYIST DUG UP SOMETHING THAT SHE THOUGHT IT MEANT THE WAREHAM DID NOT HAVE A STRONG CHIEF. WELL WAREHAM DOES AND HER QUESTIONING COST THE TOWN 2,000 DOLLARS IN LEGAL FEES TO VALIDATE WHAT WE ALREADY KNEW. BRENDA WAS PROVEN WRONG BY CIVIL SERVICE. THE REASON YOU MIGHT NOT KNOW THIS IS BECAUSE BRENDA NEVER SAID THAT SHE WAS WRONG!!!!!!!! JUST LIKE WHEN THE CLERK MAGISTRATE LAUGHED AT SLAGER'S CONTENTION THAT A POEM SENT BY A 76 YEAR OLD WAS THREATENING. SLAGER WROTE ABOUT IT IN THE PAPER AND STATED HE WOULD BE VICTORIOUS. WHEN THE CLERK DENIED SLAGERS CLAIM HE NEVER TALKED ABOUT IT AGAIN, HE EVEN TRIED TO DENY HE "SUED" THE MAN. RAGBOY LIKES TO PLAY WITH WORDS. HE TRIED TO TAKE OUT A COMPLAINT AND LOST.

IN RESPONSE TO YOUR OTHER STATEMENT YOU HAVE TO BE VERY SPECIFIC IN THE WORDS YOU USE WITH RAGBOY OR HE DENYS IT. YOU WOULD HAVE TO PUT UP THE EXACT TIME DISTANCE OR HE WOULD DENY IT. WHAT WOULD YOU SAY ABOUT A NEWSPAPER EDITOR SENDING HIS EMPLOYEE TO A BUSINESS AND A PRIVATE RESIDENCE TO CONFRONT SOMEONE? KEEP UP PANTHER WE DONT HAVE TIME TO EDUCATE YOU

slager has been exposed for the lousy husband, father, and journalist he is..bad enough we've got this awful BOS, the Observer and it's douche-bag editor ( I use the term loosely) have only made matters worse!!..we wiil look back years from now and remember just how dark a period this has been for our town..Bobo the Hobo will hopefully fade off into the sunset, to be joined by a couple of BOS members in the spring,,I could never blame his wife for not wanting him in their apartment let alone her bed!!

PinkPanther wrote:

I never believed that was why Joyce was suspended.   I don't think they ever said why.   Plus didn't they find out he was NOT a strong Chief?  I remember reading something about his contract should have been renewed every three years.  But no one knew the rules so he just kept going and going. The rules had been changed in 1929 or something like that.

Chief suspension:  https://warehamwater.cruelery.com/viewt … ?pid=48675

Strong Chief Law (Scroll down to second article): http://www.onewareham.com/index.php?opt … &Itemid=62

Enough with the distractions.... your motive of disruption and chaos at these boards are quite transparent.

Auto-edited on 2020-08-11 to update URLs

ATENN  FAT ASS SLAGER, DUNKIN DONUTS HAS  A SPECIAL ON YOUR BIRTHDAY  GO IN TO YOUR LOCAL DUNKIN DONUTS AND EAT ALL YOU CAN EAT BAGELS  , YES YOU HEARD IT  FIRST  ALL YOU CAN EAT BAGELS DAY AT YOUR LOCAL DUNKIN DONUTS , YOU HERE THAT FAT BOY  ,  I JUST HOPE YOU DONT SEND IN YOUR REALITIVES AND CHEAT  BECAUSE WE KNOW YOU LIKE YOUR BAGELS FAT BOY,   I  GUESS FAT BOY IS SITING AT HIS OFFICE RITE NOW , IN HIS SHORTS BLOGING TO MS LILY AOUT HOW GEORGE COLEMAN IS BEING MISTREATED BECAUSE THIS WOMEN JUMPED IN FRONT OF HIS CRIME WATCH VECHICLE FOR HER FREE LUNCH AT THE BAND SHELL.

ITS ALMOST 930 WILL SLAGER BE ABLE TO MAKE IT HOME TONIGHT?