#1 2009-07-01 17:55:41
Hip Hip Hooray
Slager is gay
Hip Hip Hooray
Brucie he did lay
Hip Hip Hooray
For his website,
we don't pay.
Offline
#2 2009-07-01 18:01:07
reeeel classy mixie. is this what you did in the roaring 20's as a good time girl? jingles? jee eezus! and they say i'm nuts.
Offline
#3 2009-07-01 18:19:16
oh before i forget mixie, you never answered my question. did the library try to stop the audit on computers donated by the friends of the library to the wareham PUBLIC LIBRARY? when the phone don't ring, i'll know its you.
Offline
#4 2009-07-01 18:44:53
Let's clear up some misinformation, firstly the Friends not only donated the computers, they pay for their maintenance and repair also.
Secondly, the computers contain sensitive library card holder information, such as who has checked out which books. That information is protected under privacy laws.
How would you feel Hooray if Slager got a copy of the audit showing you had checked out the book "Telling Your Spouse You are Transgender For Idiots", not to suggest that you are but how embarrassing for that to now be public knowledge.
Public employees are not held to any hugher standard than anyone else, except certain employees such as police, fire and high level administrators. That has been upheld by numerous courts over time. Civilian employees are just that, civilians.
Hope that helps, I'll lend you the five bucks to go to Slager's site, he could use a friend, so far he only has himself, his wife, his mother, and Jane. Man he is a chick magnet.
Offline
#5 2009-07-01 20:03:04
yep frogs, real national security issue there. hmmm. l-i-b-r-a-r-y c-a-r-d holder info. real secret squire stuff there. what i don't understand? if it is so sensitive, why are such sensitive information as l-i-b-r-a-r-y c-a-r-d holder information NOT being stored on TOWN OWNED computers where official security procedures can insure that there is no unauthorized disclosure of this sensitive information.
seems to me that SOMEONE is not insuring the safety of town resident information by putting it on a private system outside the reach and security monitoring of whoever handles the town IT security.
and if you say you can't trust town government or its employees................
Offline
#6 2009-07-01 20:07:08
Frogs, I have been to the library and asked them to tell me what I had checked out earlier. They told me they don't store that information. I wish they did.
Offline
#7 2009-07-01 20:31:51
Good to hear Pink.
Hooray, the library's system is on SAILS, that is the system that stores info. And no, the Town has no business accessing people's library records.
Offline
#8 2009-07-01 20:42:36
AUDITS, WHATEVER THE COMPUTERS ARE NOT THE TOWNS AND THE TOWN HAS NO BUSINESS ACCESSING THEM ESPECIALLY WHEN THE TOWN HAS A LAWSUIT WITH THE LIBRARY TRUSTEES. CAN YOU SAY C O N F L I C T OF I N T E R E S E T. WHAT IS YOUR REAL NAME C R O N A N?
Offline
#9 2009-07-01 20:54:43
so who is the regulatory or elected entity responsible for oversight?
who is held accountable for breaches in security?
mr hate. if their not the towns, GET THEM OUT OF A TOWN OWNED PUBLIC BUILDING! no weaseling about public/private entities. can YOU say conflict of interest?
you people just don't want to be held to any one standard. you'll collect taxpayer money, get payed by taxpayers but feel you should not be held to any taxpayer oversight.
frogs, you obviously don't belong in any governmental organization if you don't realize who you work for. there is a reason its called public service.
Offline
#10 2009-07-01 21:14:59
THE COMPUTERS WERE GIVEN TO BETTER THE TOWN BECAUSE THE TOWN COULD NOT AFFORD COMPUTERS FOR THE LIBRARY. ARE YOU A FUCKING NUTJOB OR WHAT? GET THEM OUT OF TOWN BUILDINGS? IS THAT SLAGERS IDEA OF PROGRESS? DONT WORRY NOBODY WILL GIVE OR DONATE TO THIS FUCKING TOWN
Offline
#11 2009-07-01 21:25:49
Mr. Audit:
I happen to be very familiar with governmental organization and I fully understand who the employees, elected officials and volunteers are working for. Me and you and everyone else in Wareham.
However, whether I belong in public service (or even if I am in public service) is irrelevant. In fact I did work for a municipality for quite some time and left. Now I do more exciting things like blog.
I have absolutely no problem when the TA has a reasonable belief that an employee is misusing or abusing the town owned equipment. Whether it is a computer or anything else for that matter. My issue here is that there is no scope to this "audit" and because no one knows what they are looking for it becomes a fishing expedition.
I have a problem with this because it requires thec opying of information that the ITA does not need to complete an actual investigation into wrong doing, but since he isn't looking for specific wrong doing then he has to look everywhere in the hope that he will find it.
I am sure he will find that people book vacations and check personal e-mail. I do not have a problem with that, I have run a business and had employees and you know, they are human.
I think the public in general believes that they have a right to scrutinize the public employee in a manner that no one else is subject to. I disagree with that. I do believe that (as I state above) employees, elected officials and volunteers are all accountable to the tax payer. But, where is there a shred of evidence that anyone has done anything wrong?
I respect your privacy, if you have a book on hold I am not privy to the title of that book. If you have disclosed personal financial information during an abatement process I am not privy to that information. If you were transported to Tobey via ambulance because you took a little blue pill and had an erection that lasted more than 8 hours I am not privy to that information.
But, here's the thing, NO ONE knows where any of that private information is now. That's my point, that's all. If you want me to hear you then you need to hear me.
Offline
#12 2009-07-01 22:14:11
Whewww ihateslager.. Take a xanax. You sound like your heads going to blow right off your shoulders. How's your blood preasure?? Don't let it get to you so bad.
Offline
#13 2009-07-02 13:58:25
i agree with you frogs. macarthy and hoover, though are long dead. the idea that the town knows what books someone takes out, while not desirable, is not life threatening to liberty if investigators come across it during an investigation.
the argument about the assessors files and privacy is laughable considering the accusations, whether true or not, by individuals on this board about certain town figures. or about police records on people. please! before people take the high ground, don't forget people see the hypocrisy.
does an audit require the same guidelines as a warrant? can an audit be a fishing expedition? maybe, but i'm not so sure. an audit is just that. too generate a record of past use and veracity.
i agree with you on this matter, i don't care two bits if people do their online banking, book a plane ticket or read the news online during work hours when there is down time. just like i don't consider it a major offense if someone gets a pic in their inbox of a nude woman. i know women will scream its porn but its not. a pee pee slapping is all that's necessary. no pun intended.
but actually searching for porn is another matter. and one that warrants removal.
i think i should clarify my position on audits being necessary for law enforcement. i have little fear of any serpico type corruption with wpd. why i feel audits are necessary is that corruption is like a cancer and needs to be ruthlessly excised before it can spread. we rely on the integrity of our law enforcement and no matter how much one tries you get bad apples. this applies to any and every group. from priests to military to fast food workers.
i am generally comfortable with the wpd, i hope this has been clarified.
"But, where is there a shred of evidence that anyone has done anything wrong?" i want spinney, and the "friends of the library" out in the open . not that i care about the library, but that money (especially in this economic downturn) be FULLY accounted. and if it takes 50 grand to do it, so be it.
Offline
#14 2009-07-02 14:37:51
hoorayforAUDITS wrote:
does an audit require the same guidelines as a warrant? can an audit be a fishing expedition? maybe, but i'm not so sure. an audit is just that. too generate a record of past use and veracity.
Employees everywhere squander the boss' nickle and most enterprises the size of our municipal government implement safeguards. Several cost competitive solutions were suggested in recent years, but this BOS turned them down.
Go ahead, listen to that illegal executive session again. I'll wait.
Trust your ears. The purpose of the data sweep is retaliatory. But you're fine with that, right?
not that i care about the library, but that money (especially in this economic downturn) be FULLY accounted. and if it takes 50 grand to do it, so be it.
Did someone sprinkle fairy dust on your oats this morning? An audit and analysis of 80+, multiple drive computer systems will cost how much?
Offline
#15 2009-07-02 19:49:34
Audits... In this economic downturn shouldn"t the selectman and TA be more fiscally responsible. Town employees have lost their jobs, and some of these employees may never get their jobs back. Town employees have agreed to furloughs to help save their jobs and help the town save money. People are hurting financially. To throw away 50 plus grand is just nuts.
I'm not crazy about people shopping on-line, emailing friends, or downloading porn at work, but it happens all over the country. I don't think we should waste 50 grand to establish whether town employees are guilty of these minor infractions. As Bill said, you should listen to the tape of the ES. The selectman do mention that they want to find the bloggers. However the bloggers may not be their only target.
The problem is the selectman and the TA aren't being transparent. They are the ones that seem to be hiding everything. I can understand not saying anything before the audit but after the data was collected, they could have and should have told the tax payers that they were looking for x y z. Instead they chose to keep everything a secret. Whatever they find, if anything, they can say "oh yeah that's what we thought we would find, we were right.
Offline
#16 2009-07-02 21:03:49
"Town employees have lost their jobs, and some of these employees may never get their jobs back. Town employees have agreed to furloughs to help save their jobs and help the town save money" lol. and some have resigned.
please tell that to NON-TOWN employees in wareham and elsewhere that HAVEN'T gotten raises in a year or more or who have been laid off, had overtime cut or are struggling to keep a job. AMAZING! how self-centered. i'll try not to cry in my coffee.
was this a pay freeze AND furloughs? the one thing i have never ever agreed with was pay cuts. i know what you will say. but a furlough is a pay cut. BS. you get the day off without pay. just like 80% of the taxpaying civilian workforce in wareham deal with every single day.
but do YOU give a care....NOPE! let them eat cake....right marny? the poor souls who you people proclaim this audit will put at risk. the people who don't get paid when they miss a day at work. christ, you make me sick.
it is my hope that we get through this recession quickly. i have no desire to see town employees take the hit. but they are also part of this recession. most times government employees forget this.
and if they do find something they didn't know about in the "fishing expedition" and it is illegal, what we should forget about it?
Offline
#17 2009-07-02 21:50:28
That's right a recession not voluntarilly spent money to see if employees are blogging as stated in the audio.
Offline
#18 2009-07-02 23:51:56
Hooray, For your information most employees on the non- school side have not gotten a raise since 2007. Have not even had a contract negotiated since that time either. As a matter of fact the only time the unions are even approached by this current ITA is when he wants to notifiy them that he is laying more people off or Force them to take furloughs (which by the way was a $1300 pay cut off of their base salary in a short 3 month period). THe people I have talked to at the Town Barn told me they were told all spring overtime was cut with the exception of funeral's. (But I'm sure if you had it your way Hooray you would have that corpse sit around and fester till a Monday so that over time could be cut too.)
This recession has effected town employee's just like everyone else. They pay taxes.Their grocery, fuel,insurance,property taxes,and utility bills have gone up. Their hourly pay has remained unchanged for a few years now. They come into work every day wondering when the next round of State Aid cuts are coming and if the cuts will cost them their job. To imply for even a second that what is going on with the economy doesn't effect a Town Employee every bit as much as a NON-TOWN employee simply could not be further from the truth.
Now the Insurance advisory panel finds out that there is a strong probability that the insurance trust fund has been used year after year to help balance the budget. This is not money the town paid in but the 25% that the employees contribute every week. Money that in surplus years could have went towards lowering thier Insurance Premiums instead of raising them.
These are not department heads but other town employees that work in the trenches at town hall, the library, Town Barn and elswhere serviceing the public. These are people for the most part who live in this Town and pay taxes just like you. These are people who applied and got jobs working for the town. People that from time to time have to deal with An Ignorant customer with a hair across his or her ass, that has it in his or her head that since they pay taxes in this town they own that secretary or municipal maintaince worker. When confronted like that they usually just take it and service the customer like the professionals that they are.
It used to be that the BOS respected those Employees and the job they did. Not anymore. They could really care less. They would rather look at them as evil and treat them like crap. Sure they make the occasional statement claiming they aprreciate them but their actions towards them do not back those statements.
You want to talk about sickening try being a town employee who was forced to take furloughs or got layed off in a recession where jobs are hard to find. You are told that this is happening because the Town which you work for is so broke that they can't even make payroll untill the end of the year. Then while you watch some of your co-workers join the unemployment line, while your at home trying to figure out how to cover your household expences because you just lost $1300 in pay, You find out that the ITA has been ordered by the BOS to copy and Audit all the harddrives in town. You later read in the news or hear around the office that not only there seems to be no real indicator of what they are looking for but you also find out that the cost of this audit could have saved a couple of jobs or kept you and all your fellow secretaries from having to take the furlough days. How could you if you were them not be upset or insulted when seeing this happen. This in what has turned into a relentless assult by the BOS and ITA on Town employees.
Doing this audit in the same fiscal year that you already cried poor can not be looked at any other way but being fiscally irresponsible.
Offline
#19 2009-07-03 19:43:04
so who should we all feel more sorry for? you may not believe it but i do feel for anyone having it hard right now. i blame those in washington who have sold us down the river to china. no one can live on a salary at dunkin donuts or burger king but those traitors in DC have helped to make sure those are the only jobs left. and they're still not happy until they've imported half central america to take those jobs as well.
what many people are getting tired of is public unions screaming for more money and people who are having it tough having their taxes go while making less every week. is it any wonder massachusetts is one of the highest states for taxpayer emigration?
Offline
#20 2009-07-04 04:54:04
i agree hooray in your last post, but ther is more going on in wareham than a recession , the selectman are usuing this downturn to settle old scores foreing out good employees and hireing new ones at higher salery rates for new beginers , hooray you need to get your news from other places than the rag, slager is a mental case and a liar.
Offline
#21 2009-07-04 07:28:05
So Hooray when was the last time you got a raise? Why don't you post your salery here. How about disclosing your benifits packge. Mabey why don't you go into work tommorow and demand that your employer sieze all computers at your workplace for no particular reason than to find somthineg that may not even exsist and when you do, make sure that you demand that they make you take two or three unpaid days off so they can fund it. You will come back with some snappy comback I'm sure but I'm equally sure that you will not post the information because it is none of our buisness. When someone is a public employee they don't have that option because everything is public information to the tax payers.
I work at a company that has been stuggling as of late. We have not experienced layoffs,but our increases have been less.Something is better than nothing though. That is what Municipal employees have seen in the past 3 years nothing, zip, nada. The managers took a 10% pay cut at the beginnig of year along with a huge amount of abuse by this BOS.
The Unions are not screaming for huge amounts of money like you would like to claim. They realize that the Town is struggling, That is why they agreed to take unpaid furlough days when asked to by the ITA. What they are screaming for how ever is for the Town to at least come to the table and negotiate.To me that is a reasonable expectation. You keep talking about peoples sentiment towards public employees is anger that they would even want one penny while others are making less and others are paying more in taxes. What I will continue to say to that is public employees are paying more taxes too. The difference here is they are having to pay it while dealing with the ignorance of some tax payers that would rather convince themselves that Public Employees have it easy than realize that for the most part Public Employees are in the same boat as they are.
Public Employee's are not looking for sympathy. They have more Pride than that. However a reasonble amount of respect should not be too much to ask for.
Offline
#22 2009-07-04 08:35:51
LETS SEE HOORAY TAKE POLICE FOR EXAMPLE. THE GOVERNOR WANTS TO TAKE AWAY DETAIL PAY, CUT THE QUINN BILL, MAKE THE QUINN BILL NOT COUNT AS RETIREMENT AS IT HAS BEEN, NO OVERTIME FROM CITIES AND TOWNS, ASKED TO TAKE 15% CUT A COUPLE MONTHS AGO, NO CONTRACT FOR TWO YEARS. OH YEAH THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ARE DOING GREAT OUT THERE. A POLICE OFFICER CAN MAKE THEIR BASE SALARY WORKING AS A MANAGER FOR MCDONALDS. A ROCHESTER AND CARVER PATROLMAN HAVE HIGHER BASE SALARIES THAN AN OFFICER IN WAREHAM. I DONT EVEN HAVE TO TELL YOU THE DIFFERENCE IN WORKLOAD.
Offline
#23 2009-07-04 09:26:28
We kicked our own ass. Been saying that for years. Remember when it was a proud thing to pick something up and read the lable Made in the USA?
Rich buttheads wanted cheap labor. Sent much of our work to that poor country China. Now they are better off then we are.
I know there are several police on this site. But I am so tired of hearing the complaints about their jobs and how hard it is and how they don't make enough money. How mean the BOS has been to them because they don't think they are all heros, how bad all the teens are how the old station is rickety how old the cruisers are how they need more tasers. Sorrry guys and gals. There's no money. I am not saying you have an easy job. Just that you have a job. A very important job at that. My man has been working at the same place for many many years. He is brilliant at what he does. He still gets one week vaca a year. paid I mean. He has not got a raise in many years. But we are thankful that he has a job. We have helped people almost everyday for free we don't expect hero badges and we don't brag about it. We just do it because it is the right thing to do. As far as the library goes I love it.
Just my opinion again.
Offline
#24 2009-07-04 09:35:24
I hope all the police officers are safe tonight. And I hope they handle all the crazy teens and young people well. Good luck really I mean that. I hope tonight goes smoothly. Maybe a lot to ask for on 4th of July. I heard a couple of towns have cancelled their fireworks so Onset will be packed I'm sure. Me I think I'll watch them from the boat.
Offline
#25 2009-07-04 09:46:17
Don't like to watch a violent movie? Don't look at it.
Don't like porno? Don't look at it.
Don't like the rag? Don't look at it.
Don't like what is said on this site? Make this your LAST visit.
Last edited by Molly (2009-07-04 09:46:55)
Offline
#26 2009-07-04 10:10:24
YEAH MOST TOWNS DID CANCEL THEM BECAUSE OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY. BUT LOOK AT IT THIS WAY THE GUYS LAID OFF AND ON FURLOUGH DAYS CAN ATTEND THE FIREWORKS AT LEAST RIGHT? IT IS WRONG TO BLOW OFF FIREWORKS WHEN PEOPLE ARE LAID OFF AND ON FURLOUGH DAYS!
Offline
#27 2009-07-04 12:14:54
Walked around Onset center this a.m. It looks wonderful. People bustleing around. One young man playing drums and buckets on the side walk. Kids scuffeling off to the beach. Everyone looking so happy to see the sunshine. It's a wonderful day in the neighborhood.
Offline
#28 2009-07-04 15:47:38
Wait ntil the sun goes down Pink, many of us would feel safer at the Brockton Fair, oh wait, we are Brockton now, thanks Brenda!
Offline
#29 2009-07-04 17:04:12
Molly - isnt that the Ragman's argument? He doesn't force anyone to read the rag? No one is forced to read this site either.
Offline
#30 2009-07-05 06:23:35
gwb, i did get a raise this year, and believe it or not i am uncomfortable with that. admittedly i, like anyone else, like making more money but i feel it was inappropriate in this recession. and no i can not just give it back. it doesn't work that way.
my benefits package is good. but i don't make anything like 80% at retirement. i put into ssi as well so i would have to check the numbers but i still don't think it comes out to 80%.
ihateslager.....i recognize the dangerousness of their jobs. i certainly wouldn't want to be a cop in this town and have to deal with the .....you pulled me over cause i'm......and the politicians backing down cause they don't want to hear from (scared S!@#less of) the race hustlers.
molly i totally agree with you but since i can't go to a bar and have a cigarette with my beer because too many people think where ever they go the majority should change to accommodate them (you sound like one of them) then i have as much right to post here as you do. again i'll say it....you reap what you sow.
Last edited by hoorayforAUDITS (2009-07-05 06:59:04)
Offline
#31 2009-07-05 08:16:14
Audits, you could always donate your raise to a soup kitchen. I'm sure you will.
Offline