#1 2009-03-07 18:41:13
slagger praises ryans colilumn in the courier. the press releases now will come from sangueniet who will get his marching orders from bruce. they will report lies and the former bos says they were corrupt, that is crap. there were no deficet and the town services were up and running. slager will lose his lawsuit with the chief and what the hell is your obbession with the late mary pillsbury????? she can not defend herself and you continue to hit her in your paper saying that she used her position to get raises. you out of your mind slager. the only corrupt bos is the current one. this bos has many members that falsified loan documents stating that they work for the town of wareham when they dont. bruce cost this town millions for the swifts beach fiasco. yes slager he voted !!!!!!!!! and a direct conflict of interest. shit in your hat
Offline
#2 2009-03-07 19:52:40
Try not to get upset with slager's malicious behavior. He is just as mean spirited as anyone could ever be. Just focus on the slapp. Imagine the demoralization of the rag when slager is put in his place. I have a feeling ragman will be slapped real soon. And think about the injustice of it all. Ragman writes all his slanted stories to get the approval of brucie, but in the end, ragman will fail, lose all his money and brucie will still be whole. (for the time being)
Offline
#3 2009-03-07 20:08:06
Hey here's the answer to where bobbie has been sleeping. Just look to the right...well keep looking to the right. The pictures change frequently. Bobbie likes the outdoor life.
Offline
#4 2009-03-23 18:02:14
Slager has a new article up about Ryan Richardson. I read Slager's version of why Richardson is no longer a Courier reporter but I know better to believe what Slager writes. Does anyone know the real story?
Slager also claims that a woman holding a Cara Winslow sign was "partially hiding behind" the sign in a photo that accompanied a story about the Onset candidates night. I had to look for myself. What a spin master Slager is! Her sign is about three feet shorter than the Cruz sign. It is at face level she wasn't hiding behind it and her name is clearly shown in the caption of the photo. Slager, the guy holding the Cruz sign is wearing a hat with the brim pulled down low and it is hard to see his face. Is he hiding too?
Last edited by TBL (2009-03-23 18:04:44)
Offline
#5 2009-03-23 18:25:30
If slager is going to act as the epitome of journalistic integrity he needs to take a course in proper grammar - he needs to leave ihateliz alone since ihatliz does not pretent to be a journalist.
Slager wrote:
"I informed Donahue that I would have to call him back. Corbett and I then got into a heated argument. I told her I was not interested in getting sued because of some political battle that I knew little about, one that was a clear conflict of interest on her part. She told me she understood Wareham better than me and if
I didn’t like it I should find another job"
Slager did you really mean to write that Corbett understands Wareham better that she understands you? Cuz that's what you wrote. You need to be a role model so that those who read your paper will see and learn appropriate grammar. I think what you meant was that .... She told me she understood Wareham better that I [understood wareham]
I know people hate people who are anal and point out grammatical errors; but I think slager is fair game since he keeps telling us how perfect he is and how wrong the rest of the world is.
Offline
#6 2009-03-23 18:32:22
Sam79 wrote:
I know people hate people who are anal and point out grammatical errors; but I think slager is fair game since he keeps telling us how perfect he is and how wrong the rest of the world is.
The ragman seems to love pointing out grammatical errors, he wrote a whole column on Chris Regal's habits a few weeks back.
I do have a question though, was there a mention of the ragman getting sued at the bulletin and then getting "let go". I didn't remember seeing a mention of it, but I know there was a suit against the ragman by someone at the time. Bobbie omitting it is perfectly understandable as why would he want to mention the bad stuff, ethics and all.
Offline
#7 2009-03-23 19:53:47
HAHA..slager must be glued to this site. He has already corrected his poor grammar. It's embarrassing isn't it?
Offline
#8 2009-03-23 20:01:36
If the Courier really was an evil power elite corrupt organization, wouldn't they have just prevented Richardson's column from being published in the first place?
Oh wait, that's a logical argument and thus has no place in the Rag.
Last edited by Hamatron5000 (2009-03-23 20:03:07)
Offline
#9 2009-03-23 20:42:08
can't decide if it is sad or laughable that bob thinks all actions big or small revolve around him.
Offline
#10 2009-03-23 20:42:36
Slager's Ryan Richardson story is so piss poorly written, it's impossible to tell what happened. I hope Richardson himself visits here and explains. My bet, he was a last hired, first fired casualty. He hasn't ruffled feathers once that I know.
Last edited by billw (2009-03-23 21:01:07)
Offline
#11 2009-03-23 20:52:39
Soo...according to the Ragman, they fired Richardson for writing a column that they had the power to just not run in the first place?
To use a Ragman phrase, "OH MY HEAD!!!"
Ragman, have you ever thought about firing yourself?
Last edited by Hamatron5000 (2009-03-23 20:58:40)
Offline
#12 2009-03-23 21:06:10
Hamatron5000 wrote:
Ragman, have you ever thought about firing yourself?
HAHA ...that was the best thing today, except for Bill's new picture on the home page.
Offline
#13 2009-03-23 21:13:08
how about this storey bob,the chief wins his lawsuit aganist the scandel sheet the wareham observer. why not try to hire ryan but i guess he would not take a job with you,its tough working for peanuts.
Last edited by ihateliz (2009-03-23 21:14:34)
Offline
#14 2009-03-24 09:22:32
bob the world revolves around you doesnt it. maybe it is that self absorbed attitude that has left you unapproachable in your interpersonal relationships.
touted as the largest recession/depression since the 30's and one person gets fired from a company (gateway whatever)which you often claim is losing money hand over fist. i would imagine that in due time and with accurate reporting we will find that the company had more layoffs at that level. did that ever occur to you? in a time where everyone is getting layed off. maybe his exit interview was a fight over dolls .
you have got to be the largest conspiracy theorist since oliver stone.
do you know the difference between you and oliver stone. he is a success, he is talented, and his wife works for fun.
every article somehow turns into a story about you. how many times have the circumstances of your prior employment changed now. i thought you werent fired, then it was you were told to get your things. now it is just like the poor persecuted ryan. what is the truth bob. is the truth the truth or is it whatever can liken your pathetic life to the story.
hiding in the background of the winslow lady picture. come on you should be ashamed of yourself bob. hundred years ago you would have been selling snakeoil.
donahues prior screw ups which nearly bankrupt the town were thought to be unimportant when you were the editor. but you can relive the past every episode to prove your point in the wareham birdcage liner
.
case in point: you cant even write the name pillsbury without reliving the chronological timeline of every news article involving them. you cant even write an obituary of an elderly grandmother librarian without bringing up a lawsuit .
no one likes or tolerates corruption or government waste bob i pay taxes just like the next guy, just like your wife does, and just like bruce would do if he had a job i guess. you want to root out unethical behavior and i am with you. But you creating the appearance of it where it doesnt exist for the purposes of your and bruce's agenda is unacceptable.
nothing worse than a bunch of people who dont work and help society dictating the policy and commenting on those who do.
you are pathetic bob and you know it .
bob when is the last time she told you she loved you? not the obligatory expected one when you leave the house or get off the phone, but the kind like she used to when you looked in her eyes and you knew she meant it.
Last edited by oneeardog (2009-03-24 09:33:33)
Offline
#15 2009-03-24 10:04:32
Oneear,
Keep in mind though we don't even know if Richardson was "fired." It could have been anything from he found another job to he's on vacation to layoffs. Hopefully the Courier will set the truth straight...but it's something when Ragman's reputation is so low that I already know he's full of crap before I hear the other side's story.
Fired because he wrote an "anti-power elite" column is unlikely. "OK, Richardson, we're firing you for submitting an anti-power elite column that we proofread, edited, formatted, fitted onto a page, and published in a newspaper, even though we could have prevented the column from ever seeing the light of day if we wanted."
Ragman,
To use one of your patented Ragman-isms, "present your evidence!" You say Richardson was fired? What are you basing it on? Did a source tell you this? Did you hear this somehow? Do you have a copy of the pink slip? Did you do any interviews on this? All we have is you saying he was shown the door, but give us details...who showed him the door, why was he shown the door....how did YOU, learn that he was shown the door?
You wouldn't just throw your own conclusions without something to back it up, would you?
I'd tell you to "present your evidence," but obviously, none exists, or you'd have presented it already.
In response to this posting, I give it an hour, tops, before he goes online and changes his story to say a mysterious undisclosed source that he can't name told him this.
Last edited by Hamatron5000 (2009-03-24 10:10:08)
Offline
#16 2009-03-24 11:42:19
"...Richardson was reportedly shown the door after upper management heard about it," Really, Ragman? That's the best you can do? You call that "presenting your evidence?" "Reportedly," who's reporting this, other than you?
LAME!
But at least you didn't disappoint, less than an hour, just as I called it.
Offline
#17 2009-03-24 11:52:19
Ragman, seriously, if you keep correcting your site everytime we point out your failures and shortcomings, then we hatebloggers are going to have to start sending you bills for proofreading services rendered.
Offline
#18 2009-03-24 12:10:10
i guess slager finds it important that ryan richardson was fired from the wareham courier,this story is no big deal one way or another,it doent effect the citzens of wareham one iota. but their is a story that effects the citzens of wareham and that is why havent you told the citzens of wareham why was john donahue was fired from his job at the courthouse in wareham ,a job that he secured with the backing of seneator kerry . why you havent even broken the news yhat he was fired. he was fired for 4 reasons. this man was thrown out as an assesor in wareham,he was fired from his job as an assesor in swansea ma, and now he is fired from his job at the courthouse(a polictal patronage job , you have to be a real dumb shit to get fired from a polictal patronage job) . yes he could not even pass the the boards to become a lawyer after 4 tries, this is a much more important story for the citzens of wareham what with him being a town moderator and his wife a selectmen. the 2 of them trying to gat a mayor type of gov, in wareham so john or bruce can become mayor of wareham and they can realley screw up wareham. now that is a story and not a made up one. so if tou wont tell every ont that john donahue was fired ,i will. EXTRA EZTRA READ ALL ABOUT IT JOHN DONAHUE FIRED FROM HIS POLICTAL PATRONAGE JOB AT THE WAREHAM COURTHOUSE ,A REALLY HARD THING TO DO I JUST THOUGHT YOU JUST HAD TO SHOW UP AND DRINK COOFEE, A TOTAL LOSSER AND NOW HE IS LIVING OFF HIS WIFES PAYCHECK.
Offline