#1 2009-01-02 16:31:49
Oh my goodness....The S-T did not nominate brucie as Man of the year. It really has ragman all choked up.
He is so pathetic. He has such a hard time accepting that 'wareham according to ragman' is not the truth everyone is after. Have you ever seen any of the other papers take an article written by the ragman and disect it for the public.... god forbid...someone in wareham might have positive thoughts about individuals who use their time and energy to help. Alright.. so now he can make brucie man of the year. I wonder why he continues to rant about things that he does on a daily basis. He projects himself onto other writers which is why he can see so clearly their faults.
Offline
#2 2009-01-02 21:01:25
He's out of "news" stories so he has to "Slagerize" other newspapers' articles.
Doesn't he write a daily dossier? I can only imagine the insane ramblings in that piece of crap.
Offline
#3 2009-01-02 21:23:55
commonsense wrote:
He's out of "news" stories so he has to "Slagerize" other newspapers' articles.
Doesn't he write a daily dossier? I can only imagine the insane ramblings in that piece of crap.
He says he writes a daily dossier, but I have never heard of anyone who subscribes to it. I suppose those that ragman praises unnecessarily in the rag are the ones who subscribe.
And just for the record, I was never kicked off the S-T. And I miss those other folks: Frogsrule, Sam, EW and others who I can't think of right now.
Imagine how crazy ragman must have gone when he saw the man of the year. He is so out of control emotionally. That's the biggest cheer to have the knowledge of the man of the year and how it must be grating him.
Offline
#4 2009-01-03 02:28:48
I don't think anyone has been kicked off the ST website. Discussions were deleted though after they got a little personal.
Offline
