#1 2009-07-22 22:13:10

SLAGER IN HIS ARTICALSHAS ALREADY COME OUT WITH DISTAIN FOR THE RITES OF PEOPLE ATTENDING THIS MEETING AND WILL TRY TO TURN IT INTO A SIDE SHOW , AND SAYS HE WILL ATTEND , PLEASE DONT LET THIS FAT BASTARD ATTEND THIS MEETING , AND I CAN TELL YOU SLAGER I DONT WANT TO SEE YOU ATTEND THIS MEETING , TOU CARRY THE WATER OF THE SELECTMAN AND YOU DID THE WORK OF JANE DONAHUE WHEN YOU TORPEDED ONE OF THE LAST DEBATES ,.

Offline

 

#2 2009-07-22 22:20:35

Anyone can go. Let's just have an open and RESPECTFUL dialogue. It's the respectful  part that has ben missing in this town--again and again and again!

Offline

 

#3 2009-07-22 22:22:31

With any luck Dunkin Donuts will have free bagel with all you can eat cream cheese night that night and he'll go to that instead.

Offline

 

#4 2009-07-22 22:26:42

There is some question as to whether a public building can exclude residents...but he's not a resident.  doesn't pay taxes either.

It would be a good idea if someone were to copy all the recent newspaper articles about the events in town.   I think these articles clearly show what is happening in Wareham.  It's time to drown out the rag.

Offline

 

#5 2009-07-23 07:44:13

I think it would be a great idea to put together all the recent  newspaper articles  regarding "OUR TOWN" too, and I would be sure to include the rude and unprofessional email written by the BOS Chair to Bob Brady! That would be the frosting on the cake! Maybe they could get handed out at the July 30th  meeting?

Offline

 

#6 2009-07-23 08:20:35

Believe me when I say this, the last thing I am worried about is Robert Slager. By nature, he will write what he wants and spin it the way he wants. That said, who really reads his FAKE wareham observer when they look for news? He is just a wart on a camel's ass.

I think the most disturbing thing for me is the constant referral to past BOS's and all that was done 20 years ago. That does not justify the actions of the current BOS. It makes no sense to me to explain what this BOS by talking about the past.

Offline

 

#7 2009-07-23 09:07:36

They've always done that.  You bring up crap this BOS has done, and they said "but look! look! the last BOS was bad!"  I don't think they were, but if they were, so what?  You morons are in the drivers' seats now and have been about 3 years.  Bruce has been in for about 6 and a half years (was in more years before on the Fin Com).  Brenda has been in since 2005.  The Donahues have run the Democrat Town Committee since the begginning of time, Jane was on the fin com many years, John ran for state rep and lost more times than you can shake a stick at and was drummed out of his job as assessor.

These people are NEW on the scene and had nothing to do with town politics until just recently?

They are too incompetent and they can't handle the job so all they can offer is blame, blame, and more blame.

Offline

 

#8 2009-07-23 09:08:38

I don't think you can bar anyone from attending the meeting because it is in a public building. Whether you can keep them from participating is another matter.

If Slager or members of the plausible press attend it gives your meeting credibility.

Offline

 

#9 2009-07-23 09:15:04

But if you are renting the space, and it is being rented by private citizens, can't you control who attends? The school department makes a little money off renting the meeting space out, so if it is a "private" meeting even though the public has been invited, it seems to me that you can exclude people if you want to.

Personally, I don't think it matters if the media are there or not. Slager will twist the truth as usual no matter what (in my opinion, of course even though many of us can prove this claim by comparing the facts to some of his rag ramblings). And the others will simply print the facts. We've got nothing to hide.

Offline

 

#10 2009-07-23 09:40:59

I know for certain some towns the rule is that meetings in town buildings have to be open to the public. Most people don't attend such meetings if they aren't welcome even if technically they are allowed to.

I don't know about Wareham's rules. Call the town clerk.

Offline

 

#11 2009-07-23 09:49:56

Don't worry, Slager is a coward when confronted.

Offline

 

#12 2009-07-23 09:51:23

Of course that won't stop him from running to his computer and writing all the stuff "he wanted to say"

Offline

 

#13 2009-07-23 13:27:50

SLAGER IS A FAT BASTARD , EVER STOOD NEXT TO HIM LATELY HE  REEKS OF COFFEE AND CIGARETES, WHERE S NO DEORANT AND SMELLS TO HIGH HEAVEN MUST BE ALL THAT LIVING AT HIS OFFICEALSO HE HAS THIS BIG GROWTH ON HIS NOSE , GUESS I WILL HAVE TO GET A RAT TO CHEW IT OFF,

Offline

 

#14 2009-07-24 03:57:45

ANOTHER PIECE OF WORK IS LIZ PEZZOLI  HAVE YOU SEEN HER TEETH THEY ARE AWFUL , AND SHE HAS A GROWTH ON HER  CHIN, WHICH IS PREETY BAD I GUESS I WILL HAVE TO GET THAT RAT TO CHEW IT OFF, SHE SMELLS BAD TO , HER WARDROBE IS AWFULL, HER DISPOSITION SUCKS , HER ETHICS ARE AWFULL IT IS WHAT IS IT IN FOR HER, AND SHE NEEDS TO TAKE A BAD MORE THAN ONCE AM MONTH WHEM THE TOWNS FIRE TRUCKS HOSE HER DOWN , MS PEZOLI NAKED MUDT BE A BAD SITE , I HOPE THE FIREMEN CLOSE THEIR EYES , I DONT WANT THESE HARD WORING FIRE MAN TO BE BLINDED .     MIXIE CAN YOU Bring up that picyure of her takeing a bath ,

Last edited by ihateliz (2009-07-24 14:24:31)

Offline

 

#15 2009-07-24 10:15:00

DID BRENDA MEET WITH SLAGER THIS WEEK GIVING HIM INFO OF THE EXUTIVE SESSTION MEETING ABOUT CRIME WATCH AND  TELLING HIM TO PORTRAY THE WITNESSES AS NUTS , WHCH HE DID THE NEXT DAY.

Last edited by ihateliz (2009-07-24 10:29:47)

Offline

 

#16 2009-07-25 10:04:02

How about this one bobo, instead of causing a scene at the meeting, why not call for the BOS supporters to make their support know at THE BALLOT BOX!! 

You know they won't be able to, so you're going to create chaos.  And if something bad should happen, it can all be traced back to you.  I think I'm going to send a group of republicans to the next democratic town committee meeting.  Would they we allowed or welcomed bobo?  I don't think so.

Offline

 

#17 2009-07-25 10:11:56

I'm not going to worry who is at the meeting. I am going to speak my mind and rely on facts. If they want to dispute that, then more power to them. Slager doesn't matter. We want change and we want people who are tired of the way this town is crumbling under the current leadership.

Offline

 

#18 2009-07-25 10:16:41

It really is hilarious.  I can tell by Ragboy's column that they are absolutely terrified of a recall.  TERRIFIED!  He and his BOS pals claim like they have this great track record to stand on, but then they hear about citizens having a meeting and they throw up their arms and start foaming at the mouth, frightened at the prospect of a recall. 

Whether it is a recall or a general election, they are so terrified that a person outside their little clique will get in there and find out what they have been doing that they will do anything to stop it.  Anything.

It's funny to watch them squirm.  That a little community meeting would cause them to feel that much fear.  Too funny.

Last edited by Hamatron5000 (2009-07-25 10:17:11)

Offline

 

#19 2009-07-25 12:04:52

BREAKING NEWS: Sweet Brucey very upset that his bitch will not be allowed into the meeting!

FROM TODAY'S STANDARD TIMES:

"The irritation of some selectmen has started to show. Board Chairman Bruce Sauvageau approached Brady in the town library after an unrelated hearing on Thursday and twice tried to interrupt a conversation to ask Brady whether the press would be allowed into his meeting. Brady turned his back on Sauvageau and continued his conversation, and Sauvageau turned to a reporter and began quizzing him about his understanding of the rules of the meeting."

http://www.southcoasttoday.com/apps/pbc … /907250346

Oh my God, Sweet Brucey!  Citizens will meet and talk and your bitch won't be able to intimidate people into shutting up!  What will you do?  Whatever will you do?!

Offline

 

#20 2009-07-25 12:08:35

RAGMAN CLAIMS HE IS ABOUT GIVING THE PEOPLE A RIGHT TO BE HEARD. IF THE PEOPLE SIGN THE PETITION TO HAVE A RECALL THAN THAT IS THE PROCESS AND THE PEOPLE ARE VOICING THEIR OPINIONS. WHY TRY TO STIFLE THEM? ITS THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS!!! IF THE BOS THINK THEY HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE VOTERS THAN THEY HAVE NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT DO THEY?

Offline

 

#21 2009-07-25 15:37:19

How much of this Ragman  ranting is over advertising?  Ragman is probably pissed he didn't get paid to run the ads for the meeting, and I'm sure he's worried that at some point in the future, new selectmen outside of the Hypocrite Elite crew might move town advertisements into non-rag newspapers, which I'm sure would take a hefty chunk of his revenue.

Last edited by Hamatron5000 (2009-07-25 15:37:59)

Offline

 

#22 2009-07-25 16:06:41

I just posted on the other thread, but let me say it here that the meeting on the 30th is NOT A DEBATE. We don't want to waste time trying to convince others that it is time for a change in this town's officials and method of governing. The list of complaints  is long We don't plan to convince people that the list is correct.

So in my opinion, Mr. Brady can limit the meeting to people of like-minds who want to TAKE BACK WAREHAM from the bos and ita  Kopelman and Prostitute (my opinion, of course) etc. etc.

I think that if Mr. Brady is moderator, and one of these opponents tries to speak, he can ask them to sit down and or leave since we are not there to debate the issues, but to try to come up with a solution to the problems AS WE SEE THEM.

Can you now understand why ragboy and the bos and mslilly and hooray for audits and their cronies need not attend?

Offline

 

#23 2009-07-25 16:34:14

Having Ragman in a Community Meeting to discuss bad leadership would be like Eisenhower inviting Goebels to attend the planning of D-Day.

Offline

 

#24 2009-07-25 17:24:56

Alright, Alright, I'm going to put this debate about whether the Ragman can attend to bed.

Ragman, there was a misprint in the ad for the meeting.  It is not a community meeting to discuss bad leadership.  This is, in fact, a meeting of the Wareham Employed Person's Society, and thus as you can imagine, as a person with only a profitless hobby, you wouldn't be interested.

Offline

 

#25 2009-07-25 17:26:18

Wait, I got it wrong.  The meeting is not a community meeting.  It is a meeting of the People Who Wear Short Sleeved Shirts and Don't Bundle Up Like Ski Instructors on 80 Degree July Days Society, and thus, you can't attend, because the weather will be very hot and you won't be allowed to wear a Barracuda.

Offline

 

#26 2009-07-25 17:27:34

Wait, wait, I got it wrong.  This is not a community meeting.  This is a meeting of the Anti-Bagel Society.  We are meeting to put a proposition on the ballot that would ban bagels.  Surely, Ragman, you would want no part of that.

Last edited by Hamatron5000 (2009-07-25 17:27:59)

Offline

 

#27 2009-07-25 17:30:31

Wait, I got it wrong.  This is not a community meeting.  This is a meeting of the Fraternal Organization of People Who Haven't Aged 50 Years in the Past Year and well, Ragboy, come on, you can see why we can't let you in.

Offline

 

#28 2009-07-25 17:32:03

"When democracy granted democratic methods to us in times of opposition, this was bound to happen in a democratic system. However, we National Socialists never asserted that we represented a democratic point of view, but we have declared openly that we used the democratic methods only in order to gain power and that, after assuming the power, we would deny to our adversaries without any consideration the means which were granted to us in times of our opposition."

--Josef Goebbels

Offline

 

#29 2009-07-25 17:59:57

Gee whiz Bill, it only took Ragboy two seconds to throw up a paragraph calling us all Nazis in response. 

"Does that mean the future of Wareham will be a "dictatorship?" Ragboy asks.  No, Ragboy, that's what the present of Wareham is, and you're its chief supporter.

Ragman should talk to his therapist about projection (i.e. when you accuse others of being what you are).

Funny, because I always thought "Herr Slagoebbels" would be yet another good nickname for Bobo. What else do you call the propaganda minister for a dictatorial regime?

Last edited by Hamatron5000 (2009-07-25 18:02:38)

Offline

 

#30 2009-07-25 18:23:22

Hamatron5000 wrote:

Gee whiz Bill, it only took Ragboy two seconds to throw up a paragraph calling us all Nazis in response.

Zero to Godwin in record time, huh?

Offline

 

#31 2009-07-25 18:26:42

Hamatron5000 wrote:

Funny, because I always thought "Herr Slagoebbels" would be yet another good nickname for Bobo. What else do you call the propaganda minister for a dictatorial regime?

Needledick.

Offline

 

#32 2009-07-25 20:41:49

Jesus, Ragman is the biggest jerkoff on the face of the planet.

Now he's trying to spread that Cape Verdeans will be banned from the meeting.  Pardon my French, but are you fucking kidding me?  That's a complete lie and he has no reason to base it on.

This race baiting prick just needs to resign immediately.  He's an embarrassment to himself and he brings nothing but shame and embarrassment to this community.

Why is he and the BOS so afraid of a community meeting to voice concerns about this town's leadership that he would stoop this low? 

Resign immediately.  To stoop this low is a new low even for him.  Resign immediately.

Offline

 

#33 2009-07-25 20:46:19

QUOTH BOBO THE RACEBAITER:

"I'm curous about something else. The Cape Verdean community has strongly supported the current board in the past. Will members of this wonderful community be barred from attending the meeting? I can't wait to hear Mr. Brady try and justify that one. The lawsuits could be staggering."

Bobo, I'm curious about something else myself.  Who the hell elected YOU the spokesman for the Cape Verdean community?

I can't think of anything more disturbing and obnoxious than a white guy from California pretending like he speaks for a different ethnic group.

That you have this much fear of a community meeting that you would stoop to race baiting speaks volumes.

Resign immediately.

Last edited by Hamatron5000 (2009-07-25 20:54:24)

Offline

 

#34 2009-07-25 20:57:14

Huh? Talk about an absurd statement. No correlation and no logic. Let's see---can we top that for absurdity?

The COA has strongly supported the current board in the past. Will any citizen over the age of 55 be barred from attending the meeting?


The sewer users have strongly supported the current board in the past. Will people who don't have septic systems be barred from attending the meeting?

Mixie? Ham? Anyone? Can you beat those for absurdity?

Offline

 

#35 2009-07-25 22:01:28

Okay, no more PC bull.....

No bobo, only you, the board, and their political cronies are encouraged NOT to attended. 

Any idiot could have figured that one out.

Offline

 

#36 2009-07-25 22:11:02

The level of panic and fear shown in Bobo's column speaks volumes.  New selectmen outside of their little group would gain the power to shed some light on their misdeeds.  They'll stoop to anything to keep that from happening...even race baiting.

Offline

 

#37 2009-07-26 07:08:18

Slager's uses this for an excuse to "update" his latest "article" with an attack:

In an article in Saturday's Standard-Times, Brady is quoted as saying "I am the sole applicant for the use of that space. I am the sole responsible party. I can dictate who gets in."

    "I can dictate who gets in" is an interesting choice of words. Does that mean the future of Wareham will be a "dictatorship?" Just wondering.

If Bob Brady said "I can determine who gets in" maybe Slager would have accused him of being "de terminator". Slager, as someone who claims to be an experienced journalist, you are reaching.

Aside from being another example of Slager not knowing how to publish online ( by adding an update without a date in the middle of an article that doesn't have a date either),

and his making himself an example of Godwin's Law,

he has the unmitigated gall to call us propagandists when he is the the only one around that fits the definition.

Offline

 

#38 2009-07-26 07:18:56

Can you see why I keep repeating the same old tune? Ignore the rag and the ragboy.

It's an old political trick---throw out a red herring---distract the people by giving them something else to get upset about whether it is true or not.

Politicians know how to do this best--and we shouldn't be surprised that ragboy is the puppet of the bos. Take the people's minds off the issues such as the computer audit, swift's beach, maple springs road, etc.


Neighbor--de terminator---love it.

So, have yourself a nice Sunday and ignore this crap about those of us concerned about our community are racist, or supporting a dictatorship. Such drivel and such crap.

Offline

 

#39 2009-07-26 07:24:24

The Ragman is not too bright and rarely comes up with ideas of his own.  His ideas mainly come from this blog.  We call him an idiot, he calls us idiots.  We compare him (first) to Goebbels, he hits google, finds out who Goebbels is, and compares us to him.

This column that never ceases to be updated is a smokescreen to distract the public from THE FACT THAT THEIR BUDDY HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH HITTING A LADY WITH A CRIMEWATCHMOBILE!!!

Offline

 

#40 2009-07-26 07:52:53

Molly, thanks - I admit I patted myself on the back thinking of that :)

Bob Brady as
http://www.mymovie-downloads.com/images/the-terminator-terminator-297809_555_800.jpg

Hamatron -

Like I said, if he had half the smarts he thinks he does he'd figure out how to format a website and would have put the update in the logical place - at the beginning of the article -

plus he'd have dated it (and would date his articles too)

-- he'd also learn to put spaces between his paragraphs...

but hell, I'd settle for him learning how to edit his long winded "articles".

I read his free page because he is the mouthpiece of the BOS and we find out what they are up to from him. You can bet anything they want to get oout will be posted on his free page.

Offline

 

#41 2009-07-26 09:31:07

Essentially, the only reason to purchase a subscription is to join in the conversation  on Sunday nights or to take part in the polls.  If he really wanted accuracy in the polls, he would open them up to the general public...but then again, we've talking about BoBo who wants people to pay to see the ads businesses pay to have published in the rag.

Offline

 

#42 2009-07-26 09:41:45

Okay, let's try this on for size:

If the Selectmen show up for the meeting, then they are are admitting they are unhappy with themselves and how they are running the town, based on the stated reason for the metting.
I think if they show up, that proves a lot!

As I said in another thread, press, specifically Slager, would NOT allow people to speak openly without targeting them in his paper. That goes against what this meeting is about.

Other than that, if people are unhappy, they will show up. There is no exclusion based on ethnic origin, religion, age, or sexual orientation.

Offline

 

#43 2009-07-26 10:16:44

You are exactly right Larry. The people who do show up, since the purpose of the meeting has been well announced, would mean that they are unhappy with the way the town is being run.

Bobo and bos take notice. LOL. Good one.

If ragboy gets in, you can be sure some people would not speak since they know they would be targets of lies and libel, fiction and baseless speculation. In fact, some may not attend if they think the ragboy is going to be allowed in.

I still think that if the town is renting the space to private organizations, then those organizations have the right to allow or disallow whomever they choose.  Has anyone checked with the school people or school committee on their room rental policy?

Offline

 

#44 2009-07-26 10:19:40

Larry I agree, I know if I were a Selectman here in town I would show up at the meeting. Because I should be representing ALL citizens in town not just those that agree with me.I would like to see Mr Cruz speak at the meeting, to get his thoughts on his first few months on the job, and if being a Selectman is everything he thought it would be.

I have noticed that he does cast many NAY votes giving Bruce fits because he cannot claim later that the actions they took were unanimous.

Offline

 

#45 2009-07-26 10:28:58

Molly wrote:

Has anyone checked with the school people or school committee on their room rental policy?

BoBo the HoBo checked.  Basiclly he was told that Bob Brady will be responsible for the decisions he makes about what to do with the space.  Isn't it baffling that the HoBo spends so much time trying to destroy  the good works of others rather than get a job that will support his family.  Strange priorities.  It just goes to show you that his own self-interest is more important than his family.

Offline

 

#46 2009-07-26 10:30:24

You actually hear Mr. Cruz? I have trouble hearing what he says, which isn't often and is usually just to vote. I am disappointed in him. Sure, at first you expect a new selectman to feel his way around and not be too vocal. But the election was in April and so much has happened, that  I'd like to hear his opinion on the issues that are brought up.

I was trying to be hopeful and give the guy a chance, but I think some of you who have blogged here are right, he is just a seat warmer put into the chair by the Donahue machine, which, in my opinion, is running out of gas.

I am not forgetting that the first we "heard" from him was in the article that said he saw Makepeace trucks hauling gravel on MS road which the Makepeace lawyers quickly refuted. Then I "heard" his voice in the 6 minute exec. session which seemed to show he was all for the witch hunt.

Another reason to show up at the meeting. Imagine what a difference it would have made if Cara Winslow--who got my vote--had won.

Offline

 

#47 2009-07-26 10:55:52

Searay,
I think this meeting is to set a course for taking back Wareham. I'm not sure how Mr. Brady will handle it, but I am betting there is an agenda to be followed.

Offline

 

#48 2009-07-26 11:07:46

Larry is right...Bob Brady will handle the meeting with dignity, grace, firmness when called for, and competently.
Let's not forget his background. Shame on anyone who underestimates him, especially those in the media.
I hope I'll be seeing the name Larry McDonald mentioned as a candidate for Selectman soon.

Offline

 

Board footer

warehamwater.cruelery.com