Is that the dossier online crap? Can someone send along a copy? You would think that if it was true it would be BREAKING NEWS for the ragboy on his regular site. He lives to scoop the competition.

The others should follow.

I know that doesn't include news stand just subscription but don't see many papers flyin off the shelf there either.

Bill W. Yes I would agree with the red herring thing. I'm sure if you could open the story the next sentence would read... The rest of the board said  heck no Bruce don't do that we wuv you.

Yes I do Bill. LOL. Sorry that was my poor attempt at sarcastis humor.

sarcastic I mean.. I can spell ok just can't type.

IP adress oh ya forgot about that. I guess that means his own little computer audit could happen. SCARY STUFF!!!!!!!!! I will have to mention that to all I come in contact with. Thanks IHS

GWB wrote:

Bill W. Yes I would agree with the red herring thing. I'm sure if you could open the story the next sentence would read... The rest of the board said  heck no Bruce don't do that we wuv you.

You are correct!  Go to the s-t site

From the S-T article:

"He refused to say where the offer occurred."

Hmmm...anyone else smell a violation of the Massachusetts Open Meeting Law?

Oh and how exactly does a news paper illegally re-brodcast a legally obtained copy of 6 min. of an illegally held executive session that was copied and given to them by a concerned citizen. Just wondering. Oh my aching root its gonna be a long year.

You can be sure a paper like the ST had their lawyers give the ok to the posting of the audio.

I don't believe for a minute that Bruce offered to resign. If he did so, it was said as a joke. But stay tuned everyone. His days as a selectman are numbered. His behavior is over the top.

These jokers can't keep acting like tyrants and getting away with it. They can't keep breaking the law and getting away with it.

Oh my gaud.  I just listened to the broadcast of the wareham mafia.  Cronan seems to have become quite the jerk... Oh I heard on the whithouse blog that the chief had resigned.....good to know the BOS gets its information from here....he doesn't read this garbage????? He can't read.  Someone reads it to him. 

So they are going to do this witch hunt in phases....hey BOS.  I'm taunting you now.  Catch me if you can.  Maybe I blogged from one of the library computers.  Ironic huh?  Friends supplied the computers for some of us to tell the truth about what you crazy people are up to.

Jane I gave you a little more credit.  But you just showed that you are the weasel that everyone says you are....not just the bloggers...everyone says you are a sneak and a weasel.

This tape of the meeting...thank you to the person responsible for taping and getting the information made public..... and thank you to the s-t.com for printing the information and setting themselves up to for the wrath of boobie....this tape will bring an end to any plans that they have to get rid of employees.  this will show they had no reason to discipline anyone. 


Weasel Jane, Brockton Brenda, Bullish Bruce, Crooked illiterate C-r-o-n-a-n, if you want to put an end to the bloggers (...what an immature, insecure childish bunch you are...) just step down from the BOS before you are pushed off in disgrace.  Jane, you ought to be ashamed of yourself for being such a sneak and a weasel.  You suck with brenda, buce and c-r-o-n-a-n the illiterate dirt thief.

billw wrote:

I believe S-T's legal counsel debated this subject for about a week, maybe more.

Please tell me you're kidding.  Are they retarded?  Or SNESL grads?

I'm sure Bill W. May be correct. But any legal depart worth their salt would do the same thing. Let's Face it Right or wrong posting the recording is a risk for the paper because this Board could challange them in court. It is a challenge I think the BOS would ultimately lose but a potential challange all the same. That being said I'm glad they came to the right decision and went ahead with the story because we the voters have the right to know the truth about what happened.

May God Bless your nephew and keep him and all these brave men safe.

From what I've heard, Jane works behind the scenes and gets others to do her dirty work thereby keeping her nose clean.   I hope the s-t and the courier keep writing about the atrocities of these mentally unfit to serve beings.

And what's with brucie's red face?  Does he have a drinking problem?

No. 1 - Bruce, if you offer your resignation to the town and not your cronies, I'm sure you would get a different response. It's not like your co-conspirators want to let you off the hook. They need you with them to take some of the blame. It was just another carefully planned grab for attention.

No. 2 - It's a shame our tax dollars are spent to by a bunch of insecure children who aren't looking out for the best interest of the town. They are self-serving fools and care little about anything but their own agenda.

No. 3 - I'd worry less about the bloggers and more about how they are going to overcome the growing support for a recall. If they first thing out of their mouths is why would we waste money on a recall, the answer is if we have to spend a little to save a lot (legal fees and more legal fees), it's the best investment the Town of Wareham will ever make.

Speaking for everyone BUT the Board of Selectmen, we accept your resignation Bruce.

Molly,
If it cost 30k for a special election, it would be money well spent. In the long run, it will probably save us countless legal fees as these bozos try to eliminate everyone that isn't on their band wagon. Future legal expenses would be avoided and perhaps we would have an increase in the tourist income because our town actually attracts tourists????

I have no problem getting involved in a recall drive. Just say the word and we can all discuss it.

Zoo:
I am happy to be part of the discussion. Someone should reach out to Mr. Tucy and ask him if he would be willing to attend a meeting also, perhaps he can give some insight into the whole mess on MSR. We need to band together, I like the comment someone made in another thread about having a common enemy.

This Board has violated the public trust by:
1. Failing to provide a transparent government.
2. Using Executive Sessions to plot their vicious agenda of hate.
3. Mismanaging public funds to the detriment fo the entire community. We have no lifeguards on our 54 miles of coast line, we have no recreation department for the children or adults of the community, we have no Town Administrator, we have no Town Accountant, we have no Town Planner, we have no Police Chief, we have a sewer enterprise fund that is not properly funded, our library was de-certified after the budget was cut by half, we have legal bills that rival towns twice our size, our schools are funded at state minimum thus denying the children the apprpriate tools by which to learn, we have decimated our Municipal Maintenance Department rendering them helpless to keep up with the needs of our community, and the list goes on and on.
4. Using their positions to benefit themselves and their friends (i.e. lying on loan documents and the Bindas situation).
5. Refusing to listen to valid concerns of voters because they believe they belong to the "power elite".
6. Meddling with the day to day operations of the Town to create chaos and unneccesary expense.
7. Demeaning and defaming Town employees.
8. Spending tax payer dollars to further their personal agendas.

Need I go on?

What should happen is they should apologize and resign. However, if they fail to do so immediately, we the people of the community should exercise our rights under our Charter and initiate a recall. Hopefully, people will step up to the plate to turn the tide and stear the community towards a brighter future.

MSRM:
I know nothing of this process, so we need to get signatures?

On Bruce's resignation offer from the Freebie Part of the Online pay per view Rag:

"Sauvageau told the Observer he asked other board members during executive session if recent articles about him in other newspapers were starting to hurt the public perception of the board."

I thought executive session business was supposed to be about the stuff you can't talk about in a public session. So why didn't Brucie make this offer of resignation during open meeting?

Note that when the ST asked where the discussion took place, Brucie declined comment. So, the cover our asses story they cooked up was that it happened in exec. But really, would that be going into exec. session for #5--criminal misconduct? #4 to discuss litigation? Or do they need to make a new number #10-Selectmen resigning. If so, that number is going to get used often in the weeks to come.

Oh and Bruce? If you have to ask if those articles are hurting public perception of the board, maybe you need a dose of reality. The board is now a laughing stock of the commonwealth. And did you really say "starting" to hurt? Oh my head.

MRM, that would be nice but you and I both know that will never happen. For one he doesn't have the guts. Second do you really think he would even want to know what the answer is.