Waaaaaah!

I've posted on BillW's websites for a couple of years, and never got invited to a single meeting of the Take Back Wareham PAC, or cabal, or whatever. Its just not fair!

Waaaaah!

I've never been allowed to meet the high & mighty officers of the TBW crowd, or get to vote for them, or to debate them, or nuthin'. what am I, chopped liver?

Waaaaaah!

I never got to write my sections of the "playbook". And worse, I never got to review & critique it before it went into the soiled hands of the BoBo (aside: toilet paper ain't enuf, bro; ya got to use SERIOUS cleansers to erase the BS from your hands).


Wa......

What's that? getting interupted here. There is no Take Back Wareham Group? there are no officers, directors, by-laws etc.? there have been no meetings?  there is no "playbook"? WTF?

You mean, that the BoBo, the one & only (just ask him),  attempted to dupe me & others with his con? I'm shocked, shocked. As shocked as the prefect of police who assured Rick that there was no gambling in Casablanca. Shocked.

What will he think of next?

745. ENCOURAGE anyone who is Slager's friend to seek public office. Since it is against the law to kick the shit out of a dog walking down the street, it's best to find another whimpering, shit for brains to pick on. If you can't find a friend of the maggot's, just kick a swan downtown. (Be careful, the little bastards will bite and attack you... unlike the Slager crowd that just hide under the covers and shit themselves).

746. REMINDER...don't let this play-book fall into the wrong hands. If "they" knew what we were doing, "they" might actually use whatever brains are in the group, and think of something useful. DON'T encourage "them".
NEVER give "them"food. Most of "them" are unemployed and will always be hungry, and we can feed "them" with bullshit, which is their favorite meal.

Cindy Parola will commit seppuku, ritual suicide, before she ever consents to manage Wareham's affairs, but only after she guns down those responsible and flails the rest of the population alive with choice invective.

How do I know this? I asked her every other time the witless one resurrected this idiocy.

I am paraphrasing, though. There's no way Cindy could ever get her hands on nuclear weapons.

Cindy Parola on Fri, 04 Mar 2011 18:09, wrote:

Actually u can quote me:  since I have no background in psychiatric medicine, I feel I am unqualified to run a nuthouse.

Oh,my gosh...you don't suppose that the TBW play book article is a part of the "creative"writing class offered to the COA,do you?

NOW it makes sense.

danoconnell wrote:

Dave...my picture please with my titles...

Your wish is my command..

Dan O'Connell

TBW Founder, President, Treasurer & Grand Poobah

ps..Bobo and the TinHats..a t-shirt does not an organization make..

Last edited by DDPTRO (2011-03-05 00:22:13)

I really, really hoped I was wrong about Mrs. DiPasquale, but now I think I might have been wrong about being wrong. Confused? As much as I wanted to give Mrs. DiPaquale the benefit of the doubt, I find that she has posted some questionable things on another web site. Now, I have to say, "Rob you were right." It appears that Mrs. DiPasquale came to this site to instigate a fight in order to obtain quotes to use on that other website. See playbook plays #4 and #5.


This was written by "cranberry" .

where do I get a copy of this playbook?

Dave...please send mackenzie "the" play book.

I think we can trust mackenzie.

Ok, you got me... Dan. you do an "end around"...Mackenzie, do a "slant & go"..and Larry can do the "Bobo Smash"..

Bill, on the next play..you run the "statue of liberty" (in bondage, of course).

Thanks Guy, I feel so much better.

Now, if I had a chance to contribute to the hypothetical, imaginary, never-was & never-will-be "playbook:  my first inclusion would be the 'fumblerooski' play, made famous by the U. of Nebraska and others. It involves having the defense lookin' over there, while the ball is over here, headin' for the goal line.

This is a play that the BoBo has attempted for years. But, unlike the Nebraska Cornhuskers, he has fooled no-one, and been thrown for a loss every time.

sorta like Einstein's definition of insanity: doing the same thing over & over, expecting different results.

So Slager Says There Was A Play Book Just Like The Library Ledger , Slager Your Finshed In Wareham , Your Just To Stupid To Realize It ,.

I think you start at not accepting the salaries of the TA and the Chief of Police (acting, part-time, whatever).

I think you should also not vote for anyone that does not ask for your vote on this site.

If candidates for office do not come to this site PERSONALLY they should not be considered for your vote.

Bill's point is that the last election proved that THIS site elected a lot of people last year.

Ignore it, ignore the vote.

What is the alternative to your vote...I don't know... write in whomever you admire for Selectman and don't vote for anyone on the ballot.

Even better, if you find one candidate you can truly support, and they ask for your vote, and they post here, then "bullet" vote them...i.e., only vote for one candidate.

The other vote... write in your favorite person.

The complaints from the TFH club is legitimate, in that, the candidates for office should tell you what their plans are and their vision for the future of Wareham.

You cant elect good people by simply bashing those who do not deserve your vote...who DOES deserve the vote and why...that is the question...

Let's see who responds.

Thanks, Dave.

I am never offended by anyone who disagrees with me, especially my brother.

I mention a write in campaign only to ENSURE the election of at least one good candidate.

I notice a lack of passion and involvement that didn't exist last year. No passion, no reasons to campaign for anyone, no issues that are standing out...I told you a couple of weeks ago...take the top two people on the ballot, alphabetically, and they will win the election because no one seems to be able to put together a cohesive,aggressive, issues oriented campaign.

It's a real sleeper, and it boils down to: "Who cares?".

How many time have you heard that in the last couple of months, Dave?

Same as me...too many.

Someone had better start campaigning and asking for votes, or Mickey Mouse may win the damn election. It's not a wasted vote, because the fictional Mickey would do just as well as those who serve or attempt to serve.

YOU are the man...you do more than anyone on this site ever has...I know the time and effort you put into everything you do to help educate and inform the public...I know how hurt you are because you are watching your Town go down the toilet because there aren't any real leaders that are willing to run for office...I know the hurt you feel knowing that your beloved Town is not going to survive unless things change...that's why you need candidates to tell you WHY to vote for them....

Where are they?

Love you, man.

I Am Voting For Frank, Donna  I Dint Trust Her ,she  Would Not Be On The Finance Commitee If She Had Not Kissed Curleys Brass Ring,and Jennifer Made A Big Mistake By  Answering Slagers 10 Questions  On Slagers Site , He Is A Liar And  For Answering His Questions Bother Me As Donna Answering Slagers 10  Questins , Frank Did Not Pander On His Site.  Who Will I Vote For The 2nd Selectmen  Maybe Slagers  Monkey Proofreader.

If there is to be a write in candidate, it should be with someone who could WIN the write in campaign.

How about Larry McDonald?

He doesn't want to run, even though he has been asked by many, so would he serve if "drafted" and won election?

Of course he would.

Larry McDonald for write in candidate for Selectman.

I know that I have heard from many of the TBW members and they all support this idea.

I understand that the last meeting of TBW solidified the concept. Out of 123 members of TBW, 120 agreed.

RUN LARRY...RUN!!

Plenty of money available for your write in campaign.

If Larry still refuses to enter the fray as a name on the ballot, use the mighty pen to write his name on the ballot.

Ive contributed to the Joseph Ashley campaign and will definitely be writing a check for Larry's candidacy..

BIG MAC FOR SELECTMAN!!!!

Larry for President

So...I have heard from a lot of people since I said Larry should run as a write in candidate. More for it than against it.

I have told everyone that I am not passionate about Larry running or not. It is up to Larry and those of you that feel you don't have a horse in the race.

The people who support the idea say that Larry would be a good Selectman, and even though he may be a reluctant Selectman, there is no doubt he would do a good job. They don't want to waste their vote on candidates they can't support. They would rather cast a vote for someone they would really like to see get elected, and hope enough people do the same. If he loses, so what? If he wins, great. Some will only vote for him, and "bullet" votes of any kind, especially in a low turnout election (which I think you can expect), are very valuable. Five candidates splitting the vote and one candidate riding the train alone...would be interesting.

Those against the idea say that Larry can't possibly win and that we are falling into the TFH's trap to say, "SEE!!!There is a Take Back Wareham group, and Larry McDonald is their candidate." We will be considered to be truly a "hate site", and they will go after this site and any candidates that support this site, thereby hurting the "legitimate" candidates, the ones on the ballot, chances of winning because of split votes for a write in. We may become totally discredited and with the hard copy edition of the TFH's news site, we will be vilified throughout the Town.

I am not leaning one way or another. I am not a voter, a taxpayer, or a resident of Wareham. I just love Wareham and am involved with this site because I care about it's future. I am grateful that you allow me to express my opinions, and many times agree with me. Disagreeing is fine. We have always agreed to disagree.

I do believe that the future of Wareham is hanging on the balance of the next few years. If you don't take control and fix the finances of the Town, there will be serious results, and everyone knows it. You need to elect people with vision, the same vision as yours, and you have to trust they will be good stewards of your interests. If not...you fire them.

I will be looking forward to see what happens.

I know one thing though: I haven't read any comments or posts by any "legitimate" candidates on this site yet.

Coming out of "blog" retirement for one post:

I appreciate the comments but I implore you to NOT write in my name on the ballot. It is not a good time for me to even attempt to run or be a Selectman. By writing my name in, you are diluting the voting base and there are a couple of viable candidates that need our support to get elected. Love you Dan'O and the rest of you, but PLEASE throw your support behind the candidates that show leadership, good fiscal responsibility, and the ability to be honest and open. Most of all, vote for a candidate that is independent. Candidate's that take PAC money are running on the agenda of a PAC and not their own independent thoughts. As we have seen throughout the political world, PAC's control the candidate, not the other way around.

Ask the question "Do you take money from PAC's?".

Most of all, get out and VOTE on April 5, 2011. Wareham has big issues and we need the best leadership to get this town back on track.

Last edited by Larry McDonald (2011-03-08 18:16:54)

NIKKI for Selectman... write in :)

Or Dave D :)

Take the time to get out and meet the candidates, ask the questions you want answer to. Dave DiPietro took the time to ask all the candidates and they are posted on here. There are several events coming up and the OPL is March 24, 2011.

Consider some of the comments made by the candidates and how they treat YOU. Think about who surrounds them and what they represent.

I can readily admit that I do not have the filter that is needed for Selectman.  Although I think Larry is the best possiblity I will be voting for Frank D. 

I agree with Larry and Dan, consider the comments made by some of the candidates and how they treat us.  What do they represent?  Do they represent me?