Whoa everybody! Don't you realize that a Myor will have all the power we desire? Let's get behind this effort to change the form of government. We have the support of Wareham so it will be easy to dominate once again.

Take Wareham Back!

beammeup wrote:

Whoa everybody! Don't you realize that a Myor will have all the power we desire? Let's get behind this effort to change the form of government. We have the support of Wareham so it will be easy to dominate once again.

Take Wareham Back!

personally i dont like the power and the things the 5+ ITA have put us in.. i WILL NOT vote to transfer all that power to 1 person..

You can bet your ass the "anti-override" selectmen will change their tunes when it comes to funding THEIR new government.

I can PROVE a connection between several CRC members and the Selectmen. Not only that, there are several committee and board members that have contributed to the Selectmen's campaigns. If the allegations that this committee has been meeting in private, that would clearly be a violation of open meeting law? What we really need is citizens that want to work FOR the best interest of the citizens and not for the politically corrupt elected officials that are looking to ride this town to better themselves.

A mayor is an elected position and does not have to have a background in municipal management. This town need strong management to correct the issues that have come close to destroying this town. Stop all this talk about the CRC and focus on removing the people that appointed them. They are truly the problem.

Take Back Wareham NOW!

So what, this is a small town. We're all connected. You can do better than that...can't you?

Interesting comments (I think) by CRC Vice Chairman "Mick" Jones on Bobo's Blog last night..(thank you little birdy)..

By: mickjones on 12/13/09
If you go to the hate site they have videos of the meeting. Strangely, they seem to still think there is a shortage.

So, has Ellen Begley's (MWF) husband David been acting as an appointed committee member PRIOR to his appointment to that committee? Brockton Brenda said "ummm, uh, umm David Begley, I believe his name is" (vid clip above)..and that he had been attending "meeting's"...In addition to comments made previously suggesting "Mick" believes the DA is a corrupt Republican lackey are interesting coming from someone who has been complicit in the CRC's "abuse" of their appointments (IMO)

By: mickjones on 12/13/09
Rob, I am not ignoring you. My motivation for volunteering has been brought into question by the hate bloggers. I am reluctant to say much of anything because it will get distorted. I wanted to do something to get the town headed in a positive direction and it was clear to me that Town Meeting and a non-elected town manager are a problem. I had ideas about how to change the charter.

Mind made up before appointment?

I love April..it really is one of my favorite months..and this one will be particularly sweet...Oh, and thanks for the "plug" on my videos, Mick..glad to know your watching.
Feel free to add the link next time... ; )
http://takebackwareham86bos.blogspot.com/

P-SPAN
TAKEBACKWAREHAM
April 6, 2010

Last edited by P-SPAN (2009-12-14 20:57:27)

It's my grandson's birthday, my anniversary and also April is the anniversary of my Dad's passing 12 years ago and if he was here now, there would be Hell to pay with this group of unselectmen.    I am sure he will be smiling down on Wareham, the day after our next election.

BB said he'd been sitting in on meeting's and had been "interviewed" by the CRC (procedure??)..and as far as Mick Jones is concerned he's been on board awhile..

Brucey can't tell BB fast enough that he had "No Idea" about anything concerning anybody being appointed to anything..(It's been 9 Months!)..yep, gotta love 'em..

Ode to Sweet Brucey (when it suits him he turns into Sgt Schultz)


P-SPAN
TAKEBACKWAREHAM
April 6, 2010

Last edited by P-SPAN (2009-12-15 08:27:41)

So basically he is saying:

I want to be on the charter review committee so I can help to get rid of the charter and get a mayor (no offense Mr. TA) to run our town.  I mean, that's the first thing out of his mouth.

Maybe he thought he was being interviewed for the No Charter Committee instead of the charter review committee. 

I thought Sleepy was going to show some spunk when he said the guy seemed to have already made up his mind and asked the candidate if he could keep an open mind. Huh? It's closed tight as a drum from the guy's first words.  Now, if Sleepy had voted no, on principal, I'd have been happy. Because let's face it, even if Sleepy voted  no, the other 4 No Charter members of the bos would have had the votes anyway.

Dare I say that once again I am disappointed in our bos?

DIRECT FROM THE CRC NEW LETTER...

"We were mandated to review the charter and to make recommendations that we believed would further that special interest."

not once did you EVER go over our charter....

nor did you ever go over the articles from TM.. Alan lied again..

A letter appeared in the Wareham Courier that was headed (taking a phrase from the writer), Charter Committee is a special interest group in disguise.
    Not in disguise. The letter-writer is absolutely correct that we are a special interest group - our special interest is in the well-functioning future governance of our town and, therefore, in the health of Wareham.

At least you cleared that up! Would it be safe to say that as a special interest group, you have a clear cut agenda?  If you are interested in the health of Wareham, perhaps you should first inform the voters and citizens of EXACTLY what is wrong with the current form of government? Not an overall, "it doesn't work", but more specifically, what caused the dysfunction? Attacking the symptons instead of the cause results in the cause going unchecked.

We were mandated to review the charter and to make recommendations that we believed would further that special interest. As we’ve said before, when a charter review committee votes to recommend a basic functional change in either the legislative or executive branch of the town government, the laws of the Commonwealth require that the charter be rewritten to reflect that new form of government.

I hestitate to point out that "basic" is one thing and "overhaul" is another. There is nothing basic about the changes your suggesting. We aren't discussing re-writing the charter, we are discussing the fact that you tossed out the current charter and are starting from scratch (I was there when this was said). So, please tell me again how the word basic figures in? The new form of government does not "basically" resemble what we currently have.

Although the letter-writer worries about taxpayer dollars being spent on attorney fees, the only legal expense we have surely incurred has been for the two hours spent at the beginning of our tenure to educate the committee about our responsibilities, rights, and limitations. We are checking with Koppelman and Paige as to any costs incurred by their review of the committee’s work-in-progress.

This statement boggles my mind! You claim the only legal expense incurred were at the start, but you also state that you are checking with K&P on their costs associated with the re-write of the charter. So, you have no idea how much you have spent? Which is it? You should get a new writer as you have contradicted yourself twice (so far) in this letter.

   

The letter-writer is mistaken in thinking that having a town council rather than a Town Meeting is an abandonment of democracy. So long as the members of the council are elected by ballot to represent the citizens, or a particular segment of the population such as a precinct, and are accountable to that group – we are still a functioning democracy.

This one is going to get you in trouble! Show me where I used the abondonment? If not, I suggest you issue a public apology. What I did say was, "Democracy, by the basic definition, is a political government that is carried out DIRECTLY by the people.  That is what Town Meeting represents, DIRECTLY by the people. " Simply put, you are removing the "voice" of citizens and allowing one person to act as a surrogate of many voices. There is a difference. If you look at our federal and state level goverment, you can see how easy it is for a citizen to lose their voice under the form of government you are suggesting.
   

One further comment about the complaint that the committee "disregard(s) written questions." Perhaps we have not made it clear enough that the questions we will respond to are about how the committee works, why it’s recommending something or what that recommendation entails or any of its implications, and the comments we will respond to are also about the committee’s process or the pros and cons of the different forms of government.
    We would like, once again, to refer all voters in Wareham to the town’s web site where, following the link to the Charter Review Committee, you can find a full explanation of our thinking that led to the rewriting of the charter and our response to comments and questions that have reached us. We urge you to participate by asking the questions that will help you to form an educated opinion about the recommended change.

So does that mean that Mr. Jones did not answer my questions? What you made clear was that citizens could pose questions through the website, which I did,  and you would respond. Now you are limiting the scope of the questions, which makes me wonder if you are acting in the best interest of the citizens or avoiding harder questions that deal with what's wrong with our current government. I have spoken with several people now that have asked questions and received no response, so please do NOT go out into public and state you are trying to get public opinion and open to discussion. You just stated you are not unless the questions fit into a specific area.
   
In the coming months, we (myself and others) will continue to push for accountability of the Charter Review Committee. We will be going to the voters and citizens and find out what they think is wrong with our current form of government (including the charter and town meeting). This is what the CRC should have done instead of deciding in the first meeting to junk our current charter and change the form of government.

SO many times you hear that government is for the people and by the people, but your actions show that democracy is the furthest thing from your mind.

Last edited by Larry McDonald (2009-12-23 11:44:11)

It sounds like everyone is celebrating Festivus  in a very good way. get it out today so that the next few days will be Joyous and BoBo free. And may 2010 be the same all year long. Have a very Marry Christmas and a Happy New Year. and now on with Festivus.

Let me get this straight..The CRC wrote a letter to the Courier saying TM was bad because of "special interest" groups..Larry then wrote a letter to the Courier informing the CRC that they ARE a special interest group..and then they respond (in the Rag) by admitting they are a special interest group, but their "interest" is EXTRA special..and they will decide what's best for the Town..and if you don't like it..or they don't like what you have to say, then your opinion isn't welcome..and you can take your issues to Town Meeting floor (the last one, if they get their way)...
KEEP TOWN MEETING!!

http://www.wickedlocal.com/wareham/home … re-of-town

P-SPAN
TAKEBACKWAREHAM
April 6, 2010

Last edited by P-SPAN (2009-12-25 17:42:19)

GateHouse News Service
Posted Jan 28, 2010 @ 10:42 AM

WAREHAM — A series of public meetings are planned to introduce Wareham voters to the Charter Review Committee’s proposed change to the form of town government. The first public meeting is scheduled to run from 1 to 3 p.m. Saturday, Feb. 6, (snow date is Saturday, Feb. 13) at the Wareham Middle School.

The Charter Review Committee will recommend at the spring Town Meeting that Wareham opt for a town government managed by an elected town council and an elected mayor. The meeting will address what, specifically, the change would mean for the town and for them.

Courier: Charter Review Committee forums

P-SPAN
TAKEBACKWAREHAM
April 6, 2010

File this one under "What Can Happen in a Mayoral Government"

This is what one city councilor (and others) had to say about the situation in which the City of Lawrence has to pay Mark Andrews "carry over" for fifteen weeks worth of sick time ($41,096) from his state job.

Patrick Blanchette, a city councilor for the past 10 years, said, until this week, he knew nothing about the deal made with Andrews.

"I think we would have questioned that," said Blanchette, the outgoing city council president. "Why would we accept sick time that accumulated somewhere else. We'd be on the hook for that?"

Lantigua's top aide, Lenny Degnan, said the deal is just more of the mounting evidence of financial mismanagement at City Hall during Sullivan's administration.

Sullivan's justification of the deal "is just him trying to cover his tracks on the way out," Degnan said. Nothing in the city charter allows this, he said.

Let's NOT find out what could go wrong in a "Sauvageau Administration"..or any other of our elected Assclowns. (sorry to steal your term, Ham..but it just seems to "fit")

Read the article. You'll see that having a Mayoral Government comes with it's own set of potential problems...and learn something about our current Town Administrator..

Oh, and speaking of the TA...What kind of "financial shape" is the city he just left in right now??

The city faces a $17 million budget deficit.

'Nuff Ced..

Deal gave city budget director credit for state sick time

Editorial: Sick leave outrage should prompt reform

P-SPAN
TAKEBACKWAREHAM
April 6, 2010

Last edited by P-SPAN (2010-01-30 23:32:55)

From the same article:

"This is only a proposal,” he [Slavin] said. “We have a backup plan. If people don’t like this, we can go back through our existing charter and discuss it with everybody and ask them what isn’t working and what we could do differently. Then we could go ahead and do what we can do to fix it.”

A BACK-UP PLAN!!!!!!!! The CRC committee is charged with REVIEWING the charter, not throwing it out. The back up plan was supposed to be the initial plan!!

It's called---wait for it---the charter REVIEW committee.  That would include going "back through our existing charter".... find out "what isn't working...and do what we can do to fix it."

No ambiguity in the phrase charter REVIEW.

This violation of the charter---that a CHARTER REVIEW must be completed every decade-- was condoned by the BoS who also want to get rid of town meeting. April 6th is coming. We need a BOS that follows the charter rather than try to dismantle it to give themselves more power.

And these committee members are so proud of what they are proposing?  They were, in my opinion, hand picked by our "leaders".  It is too bad that they didn't read the name of the committee they were chosen for.  The Charter Review Committee.  Review:  looking at or looking over again; a general survey or report; a reexamination. 

Slaven has basically said that they never read the charter over, and when they first got together it was clear to all committee members that they felt the Charter was broken and needed to be replaced.  By saying this, they have admitted that they did not review the Town Charter.  This is in direct violation of Wareham's Home Rule Charter.  This committee must be shut down.  A new committee of volunteers needs to be chosen to REVIEW our Charter.  This committee did not do their job.  If there was no review, then there is nothing to bring to Town Meeting or to a ballot vote.

So, in essence, the blame goes to the Charter.  The selectmen have been doing a great job and if there are any problems it is because the Charter has held them back.

Sorry, I didn't read anything about lawsuits and plain stupidity in the charter.
I could go on and on with this list.

NO CHARTER REVIEW = NO CHANGE IN TOWN GOVERNMENT.

"Don't divide the town over this," Silva warned. "If you think you're going to change the town government because of a few bad apples as selectmen, they're just going to run for town council."

WW: Public debates merits, wisdom of mayoral government

TAKEBACKWAREHAM
VOTE4CHANGE
April 6, 2010
P-SPAN

You would think that, when people couldn't even be bothered to come to their little presentation on Mayor government this weekend, that maybe that's a sign no one is interested in changing our government.  Throw out the clowns that are screwing the government up - not the government itself.

They had such a low turnout for that meeting that you could hear crickets chirping and they think they actually have support on this.  Clowns.

Town employees' interests don't reflect the Town's interests?
HUH?
If you had to work your ass off under an incompetent administration for low wages and no thanks, and you still have to pay taxes in Wareham....why would your interests not be the same as the Town"s?
I think this guy needs to get off of the CRC and run for Selectman. Then he will be where he belongs...into the maelstrom of political anonymity.

I'm scared! Curly John agreed with me!

here is the link to the "PROPOSED" its lengthy but an interesting read..
mick jones statements about not costing us more is crap..
not only wil the council get paid but they can get paid expenses along with the mayor...
even if someone get elected the mayor can fire them..

i could go on and on but read it for yourself!!!!

http://www.wareham.ma.us/Public_Documen … 4-000F8513

THESE UNEMPLOYED SELECTMAN AND MODERATOR ARE JUST CHAMPING ON THE BIT TO GET A TOWN SLAREY AS  MAYOR AND COUNCILMAN , BROCTEN BRENDA  NO JOB AND DECLARED BANKRUPTCY, CRONIE  THE DIRT  THIEF WENT INTO BANKRUPTCY , BRUCIE NO JOB AND CANT PAY HIS TAXES  AND THE TOWN MODERATOR BUY THE WAY WHAT DOES HE DO FOR A LIVING SINCE HE WAS FIRED FROM COURT JOB,,,,,,,, LETS SEE INCLUDING   THE HALIFAX PERVERT, THERE ARE  3 LIVING OFF THERE WIFES  BRUCE ,HALIFAX HARLOT AND THE CRIPT KEEPERS HUSBAND , BUY THE WAY WHY WOULD YOU STAY MARRIED TO THE CRIPT KEEPER , IS IT HER LOOKS OR HER PAY CHECK THAT INTERESTS YOU.

That's interesting, ggm...and I don't know the answer. Maybe try sending it to the CRC through the Town's website (there's a comment section..make sure and direct it to the CRC)

Good luck though. I've sent in at least two..and have never received a response..Oh, I'm sure they have their reasons for not responding to me, or others. As Mick Jones wrote on the tin foil hatchat a while ago in response to Larry (paraphrasing) We have responded..maybe you just didn't like what we had to say..

Another place to attempt to get your answer might be the upcoming forum they've planned..Saturday??

This can be expected..they will have a proposal at TM where those in attendance are expected to have a full grasp on a completely new Charter. Now, TM has voted for the occasional change to our Charter at various times..and I expect some of those modifications were contentious..and a few proposals (I'ld assume) failed..NOW, we're expected to trust a few people, appointed with a "mission", to tell us what's best for the Town. They'd have you believe they've done their "due diligence" by posting their "draft" on the Town's website and having a few public meetings (most of which offer(ed) NO public input).

The vast majority, I'ld say, of the citizens of Wareham have NEVER read the current Charter (a few CRC members too, I bet) and it's been around for A LONG TIME...Now, they want you to vote on a completely new Charter in one night..when for (I'ld bet) 99% of those attending, and voting it will be the FIRST time they will have ever seen or heard what the new Charter is all about.

The process is wrong..and all their "stories" don't change that..right, Mick?

http://www.wickedlocal.com/wareham/news … power-grab

TAKEBACKWAREHAM
VOTE4CHANGE
April 6, 2010
P-SPAN

Last edited by P-SPAN (2010-02-12 11:46:24)

CRC Interviews 1/27/09...I don't have this meeting (yet)..but this is from the Meeting Minutes.

Interviews to the Charter Review Committee

Present before the board: Cara Ann Winslow

Ms. Winslow works with a number of municipal governments under different charges
and would bring a wealth of knowledge about the Charter and implementing changes.
Ms. Winslow thinks it’s important that a complete and responsible review of the charter
be done with this committee and she has read the charget and some things need to be
clarified. One issue that comes up most is to clarify the day-to-day operations.

Present before the board: Peter Baum

Mr. Baum stated that he noticed problems with the Charter when the question of whom
is suppose to submit the budget the Finance Committee or the Board of Selectmen. Mr.
Baum stated that before making any changes he would like to ask the people involved
such as the Town Administrator, Board of Selectmen and the Department Heads. Some
of the weakness in the charter would be organization of the charter along with the use
of proper grammar and punctuation.

Present before the board: Alan Slavin

Mr. Slavin stated that over the last three years he feels town meeting has gone in the
wrong direction. Mr. Slavin said the charter has areas of gray, which leads to problems
on how things work function wise. The town charter needs to be modified and some
drastic changes will need to be made.

Present before the board: Patricia Rumney

Ms. Rumney said she has the time and likes to volunteer and thinks it’s important. Ms.
Rumney does not have an agenda for the charter and would like to look at things such
as the date of the submission of the budget by the Town Administrator and possibly
change the Town Meeting to be held on a Saturday. Ms. Rumney would also like to
possibly see about having an in town counsel.

Present before the board: Leie Carmody

Ms. Carmody said she was stunned when she went to her first town meeting and
thought that the town was dysfunctional. Ms. Carmody feels it’s time to change the
way the town is governed. Ms. Carmody would like to take the burden off the
Selectmen and help reduce some of the anger when a decision is made that people don’t like.

http://www.wareham.ma.us/Public_Documen … -27-09.pdf

TAKEBACKWAREHAM
VOTE4CHANGE
April 6, 2010
P-SPAN

Last edited by P-SPAN (2010-02-13 13:46:42)

P-SPAN wrote:

CRC Interviews 1/27/09...I don't have this meeting (yet)..but this is from the Meeting Minutes.

Interviews to the Charter Review Committee

Present before the board: Cara Ann Winslow

Ms. Winslow works with a number of municipal governments under different charges
and would bring a wealth of knowledge about the Charter and implementing changes.
Ms. Winslow thinks it’s important that a complete and responsible review of the charter
be done with this committee and she has read the charget and some things need to be
clarified. One issue that comes up most is to clarify the day-to-day operations.

Present before the board: Peter Baum

Mr. Baum stated that he noticed problems with the Charter when the question of whom
is suppose to submit the budget the Finance Committee or the Board of Selectmen. Mr.
Baum stated that before making any changes he would like to ask the people involved
such as the Town Administrator, Board of Selectmen and the Department Heads. Some
of the weakness in the charter would be organization of the charter along with the use
of proper grammar and punctuation.

Present before the board: Alan Slavin

Mr. Slavin stated that over the last three years he feels town meeting has gone in the
wrong direction. Mr. Slavin said the charter has areas of gray, which leads to problems
on how things work function wise. The town charter needs to be modified and some
drastic changes will need to be made.

Present before the board: Patricia Rumney

Ms. Rumney said she has the time and likes to volunteer and thinks it’s important. Ms.
Rumney does not have an agenda for the charter and would like to look at things such
as the date of the submission of the budget by the Town Administrator and possibly
change the Town Meeting to be held on a Saturday. Ms. Rumney would also like to
possibly see about having an in town counsel.

Present before the board: Leie Carmody

Ms. Carmody said she was stunned when she went to her first town meeting and
thought that the town was dysfunctional. Ms. Carmody feels it’s time to change the
way the town is governed. Ms. Carmody would like to take the burden off the
Selectmen and help reduce some of the anger when a decision is made that people don’t like.

Want to guess which were appointed? :) Just popped on for a minute.

CRC Appointments 2/17/09

Appointments: Charter Review Committee

Selectman Eckstrom recommend having nine (9) members to the Charter Review
Committee. Selectman Donahue recommended having two (2) alternates.

MOTION: Selectman Eckstrom moved the Charter Review Committee have nine
(9) voting members. Selectman Donahue seconded.
VOTE: 5-0-0 (Unanimous)

MOTION: Selectman Donahue moved to add one (1) member of the Board of
Selectmen, one (1) member of the Finance Committee and the Town Administrator as
adhoc members. Selectman Eckstrom seconded.
VOTE: 5-0-0 (Unanimous)

MOTION: Selectman Donahue moved to appoint Mary Ann Silva as a member to
the Charter Review Committee. Selectman Cronan seconded.
VOTE: 5-0-0 (Unanimous)

MOTION: Selectman Sauvageau moved to appoint Leie Carmodey as a member
to the Charter Review Committee. Selectman Donahue seconded.
VOTE: 5-0-0 (Unanimous)

MOTION: Selectman Eckstrom moved to appoint Linwood Gay as a member to
the Charter Review Committee. Selectman Sauvageau seconded.
VOTE: 5-0-0 (Unanimous)

MOTION: Selectman Cronan moved to appoint Michael Jones as a member to the
Charter Review Committee. Selectman Sauvageau seconded.
VOTE: 5-0-0 (Unanimous)

MOTION: Selectman Potter moved to appoint Edward Pacewicz as a member to
the Charter Review Committee. Selectman Sauvageau seconded.
VOTE: 5-0-0 (Unanimous)

MOTION: Selectman Sauvageau moved to appoint Lawrence Gaines as a
member to the Charter Review Committee. Selectman Eckstrom seconded.
VOTE: 5-0-0 (Unanimous)

MOTION: Selectman Donahue moved to appoint John Houton as a member to the
Charter Review Committee. Selectman Cronan seconded.
VOTE: 5-0-0 (Unanimous)

MOTION: Selectman Sauvageau moved to appoint Alan Salvin as a member to
the Charter Review Committee. Selectman Eckstrom seconded.
VOTE: 5-0-0 (Unanimous)

MOTION: Selectman Donahue moved to appoint David Smith as a member to the
Charter Review Committee. Selectman Cronan seconded.
VOTE: 5-0-0 (Unanimous)

MOTION: Selectman Doanhue moved to keep the remaining applicants on file in
case alternates are needed. Selectman Eckstrom seconded.
VOTE: 5-0-0 (Unanimous)

MOTION: Selectman Sauvageau moved the nine (9) members of the Charter
Review Committee to be Leie Carmody, Lawrence Gaines, Linwood Gay, John
Houton, Esq., Michael Jones, Edward Pacewicz, Alan Slavin and Mary Ann Silva and
David Smith

MOTION: Selectman Sauvageau moved to have Selectman Eckstrom as the
alternate Board of Selectmen member to the Charter Review Committee
VOTE: 5-0-0 (Unanimous)

http://www.wareham.ma.us/Public_Documen … -17-09.pdf

*David Begley was appointed to the CRC on 12/15/09 (see above). Larry Gaines dropped out before the first meeting (3/12/09)..they were "short-handed" for over nine months.

TAKEBACKWAREHAM
VOTE4CHANGE
April 6, 2010
P-SPAN

Last edited by P-SPAN (2010-02-13 13:54:18)

What always makes me laugh is that the BOS and CRC think that the special interests control town meeting and its only a small portion of the population.....BUT

Somehow 12 people make decisions for the Town (under the CRC plan) is better than 400+ (at Town Meeting)? 

Explain that one CRC

It was such a "staged for tv event" and no one can convince me there wasn't another violation of the public meeting law on this one. This was the most rehearsed farce they ever did.

christopher gay seemed to have a lot to say, attacking Larry & P-Span.

is he related to a member of the CRC?

Speaking of Linwood Gay, several people have raised the question as to whether the Onset fire district and/or the Wareham fire district would be affected by some of the changes being discussed. does having an employee of the Onset fire district on the CRC tell you anything?

jes wundrin'

VOTE4CHANGE

APRIL 6, 2010

ENUF' IS ENUF' !

Charter Proposal v21: AN ACT ESTABLISHING A MAYOR/TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF WAREHAM


KEEP TOWN MEETING                                  VOTEAPRIL6                                       VOTE4CHANGE

TAKEBACKWAREHAM
VOTE4CHANGE
April 6, 2010
P-SPAN

These were "broken" (Did you notice?) Anyway, they're fixed..there are ten of them (3/12/09 - 8/27/09)..I haven't "gotten around" to doing the rest..and not sure I will. Considering the decision to be made in April, they're worth a listen..unless you prefer reading, there's a link to that too.

Animated CRC Minutes


KEEP TOWN MEETING                                  VOTEAPRIL6                                       VOTE4CHANGE

TAKEBACKWAREHAM
VOTE4CHANGE
April 6, 2010
P-SPAN