Well there's your answer to his free/pay blog respone this morning. You got more hits for requested pages in June than he has had since he started his Liarserver.  Once again Slager posts more lies on his blog.

NOW LETS LOOK AT RAGBOYS FREE ARTICLE AND IT SO FULL OF LIES ITS INCREDIBLE. OH MY HEAD WHERE DO I START

I LOOK AT THE NUMBER OF VIEWS AND I SEE 828, 1203, 1108, 754 AND THAT JUST ON THE FIRST PAGE. DID RAGBOY NOT SEE THOSE NUMBERS OF HITS OR DID HE JUST PICK AND CHOOSE WHAT NUMBERS TO PRINT.

THE SITE BANNED FOR LIFE A WOMAN WHO SAID SOMETHING "CRITICAL" OF THE FORMER SELECTMAN MJP? LETS SEE WHAT WAREHAMPROPHETIS SAID ABOUT MJP. SHE CONDEMNED HER TO A LIFE IN HELL AND LIVER CANCER. SHE SAID THAT THE LORD WAS RIDDING TOWN DEPARTMENTS ONE AT A TIME. MAYBE THE LORD STEPPED IN AND THATS WHY WAREHAMPROPHETIS DIDNT WIN THE LAST SCHOOL COMMITTEE ELECTION? YES I KNOW WHO YOU ARE! I WOULD SAY THE STATEMENT IS MORE THAN CRITICAL AND IT SEEMS TO COME FROM A CRAZED NUT THAT SHOULD BE COMMITTED IN A PYCHE WARD. IM SURE SHE IS A SUBRIBER TO RAGBOYS PAPER. NOW EVEN SLAGER SAYS THAT HIS FORUM WOULD NOT TOLERATE NEGATIVE COMMENTS SO I WOULD ASSUME SHE WOULD HAVE  BEEN BANNED ON HIS SITE. JUST LIKE SLAGER GOT ME BANNED FROM THE ST TIMES WEBSITE BECAUSE HE COULD NOT TAKE THE TRUE STATEMENTS WRITTEN BY ME. YES HE CALLED AND COMPLAINED LIKE A LITTLE BOY AND GOT ME BANNED. OH WELL SHITHEAD EVERYONE KNOWS YOUR A LIAR AND YOU HAVE 3 PEOPLE ONLINE.

Ragman, you are a disgusting and pathetic little man - I'd say you are a poor excuse for a human being, but you are not even human.  Only sub-human garbage could defend what Warehamprophetess wrote.

Let the record show that Ragman has twice now come to the defense of a local Hypocrite Elitist who stated not only does she speak to God, but that God speaks through her, and that God told her that Mrs. Pillsbury came down with cancer because she disagreed with Bruce and the other selectmen, and she warned that if you disagree, then God will do the same to you.

Imagine all of the thousands of comments that have been made on this website and this above all sticks in Ragman's craw - he hold so much hatred towards a woman that disagreed with Bruce, what is it, well over 3 years ago now, that he is angered that the Prophetess was banned because he wants her to continue being able to spout off her hate speech.

You and your crew claim to be against hate speech, little Ragboy. Oh but guess what?  Hate speech is not criticizing the selectmen.  Hate speech is showing delight and glee over another's fatal illness. Delight in the pain of others - that is what you and your crew has always been and always will be about.

That's why this battle to bring good government back to Wareham has been such a struggle - we are dealing with lunatics who actually believe they are vessels of God.  You will never be able to reason with people like that.  Not in a million years.

This town doesn't need a recall.  It needs a paddy wagon and some men with white lab coats and nets.

And Ragman, you have twice now defended this hatred. Because you believe it.  A level of hatred like that is completely unprofessional for a reporter and you should resign immediately.  Someone with your mental state should not be publishing a newspaper at all.

Last edited by Hamatron5000 (2009-06-30 10:59:08)