#1 2009-06-07 20:14:33
Ragman has responded to Unger's charge that he is Bruce's mouthpiece by calling Bruce this afternoon.
Check his latest.
Offline
#2 2009-06-07 20:31:58
Let them live with their delusion. One might think they would be mortified tha objective journalists are seeing them for what they truly are. Nope! Introspection must be be too painful for them..and it would certainly get in the way of continuing with their hit list. They are angry beasts who will stop at nothing....
Boobie gave the phone number and email...haha boobie, what makes you think we haven't already been filling in the journalist's head with all the sordid details of wareham's corrupt politics.
Offline
#3 2009-06-07 20:50:33
Pathetic!
Written that way, looks good for BOS. Add in all the REAL details, then you see the big picture we all saw long ago.
Reeks of desperation. And who wrote that Bob or Bruce? What is this, the third story that states the same thing over and over again.
NO ONE LISTENS TO YOU ANYMORE!
Offline
#4 2009-06-07 20:57:24
Oh, and you said it yourself RagMan... The Selectmen are in charge of setting policy. It is not for THEM to decide who is doing their job. Department heads then TA. Since they are shit-canning department heads left and right, and holding onto an "ITA," I guess they think the ball is in their court.
Offline
#5 2009-06-07 21:13:21
And Boobie, candace was the first to jump ship after repeated slurs and distortions in the rag. She left. And then it was decided not to hire someone for that position. OK that statement was wrong...which other statements (rationalizations) are untrue?????
Truth hurts doesn't it? Especially when the truth can be seen by all your neighbors, church, brownie troop. How does it feel to see your shortcomings paraded for everyone to see.
You'll never know when the national press decides to print more of wareham's truth. Keep telling the real journalists how to do their job.
Offline
#6 2009-06-07 21:21:40
this latest diatribe from slager shows he is comong un hinged , cant spend some time with liza today got to respond to ungers column , you afe a pathetic loser,you are being exposed for the asshole you are,and you cant take it. i have said their is a hit list for over a year now , oh well it might not bei written down but there is one shit head , go make love to liza ( why it doesnt happen ,well you look like a serial nut) so you pull out the computor and rattle off more lies
Offline
#7 2009-06-08 07:09:08
A REAL reporter would have called some of the people who are out of jobs and those who are the current targets of the BOS to get both sides of the story. I guess the story by Bruce Almighty is all that is needed. Call your personal god for a twisted version of the truth.
A REAL reporter would know that you can't target a "lobby. "The Library Lobby – They have to be No. 1." If elected officials can in any way target a "lobby" I'd like to see that. How absurd. What--the BOS are so powerful they can fire people who don't even work for the town? Huh? Did they target the trustees? Slager has never gotten both sides of this story.
I guess this statement by Bruce dose not imply a target--huh?: Sauvageau’s classless attack on Pillsbury’s son during one of these meetings did little to enhance the appearance of his objectivity. Slager, what constitutes a target in your world? Calling someone a "gutless coward" is real professional and more than a bit target-like. And did you miss the time on public tv when Bruce said the chief "couldn't manage his way out of a paper bag" when discussing the chief's management of his department? Again, totally unprofessional to discuss employees in such a way. Paint the bulls eye on the chief's forehead why don't ya Bruce.
Notice there is no mention of the real hit list--people still working like Gifford and Simmons who were mentioned in the illegal executive session. The Harbormaster has long been a target---a seaside town--let's make it a part time position. Huh?
Notice that no mention is made of all the legal cases that have been brought by the people who have been "hit" by this BOS or the cost to the taxpayers. Did you talk to the people in your article ragboy? Whalley, Bliss, Gricus, McAullife, Hartman, Bell?? You would be shocked to hear some of their stories. But you'll have to wait until the legal cases are resolved. The one's that have been resolved have cost the taxpayers in legal fees and settlements. Where is the reporting?
Once a hack, always a hack.
Offline
