#1 2009-05-14 14:00:11
DID YOU REPORT IT TO THE WAREHAM POLICE THEN RAGMAN??? I ALREADY CALLED THEM AS WELL AND THE ANSWER IS NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! EXPECT A REWRITE IN MY JEER SOON
Offline
#2 2009-05-14 14:40:51
SO LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT RAGMAN YOU HAD NO PROBLEM CALLING THE POLICE TO REPORT WHEN AN ELDERLY MAN SENT YOU A POEM AND YOU HAD NO PROBLEM TAKING THE POEM TO THE CLERK MAGISTRATE OF THE WAREHAM DISTRICT COURT TO TRY AND HAVE MR WHEELER CHARGED WITH WAS SUBSEQUENTLY DISMISSED (SO RIDICOULOUS IT NEVER MADE IT TO A JUDGE WHICH YOU CONVEINENTLY STOPPED WRITING ABOUT) BUT SOMEONE ALLEDGELY SENDS YOU 2 DOLL HEADS WHICH YOU CONSIDER A THREAT TO YOUR KIDS BUT YOU DO NOTHING???????????? YOU ARE A LIAR SLAGER AND THIS WAS WAY TOO EASY. YOUR LIES ARE CATCHING UP WITH YOU. YOU CANT KEEP THEM STRAIGHT. NO ONE WOULD BELIEVE SUCH A PREPOSTEROUS STORY. AND I GUESS YOU SEEM TO THINK IT WAS SENT BY MJP, WHERE IS YOUR PROOF???? YOU HAVE JUST DEFAMED A DECEASED PERSON WHO CANT DEFEND HERSELF. AGAIN I ASK YOU WHERE IS YOUR PROOF. YOUVE GOTTEN MY IDENTITY WRONG NUMEROUS TIMES , WHERE IS YOUR PROOF? THERE IS NONE BECAUSE IT NEVER HAPPENED YOU LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!! CALL POLICE AND GO TO COURT OVER POEM SENT BY 75 YEAR OLD MAN BUT GET TWO DOLL HEADS AS A THREAT TO DAUGHTERS AND DONT DO ANYTHING??????? LIAR, LIAR, LIAR
Offline
#3 2009-05-14 16:08:03
APB SENT TO LOCAL DEPARTMENT STORES:
Be on the look-out for a grown man buying multiple female baby dolls. (He doesn't care what the heads or faces look like) These dolls will be used to fabricate evidence. Answers to the name of ragman - he is not dangerous because he thinks his pen is mightier than the sword. Has possibility of losing head.
Offline
#4 2009-05-14 20:40:43
No lies here ragboy your not even a ragman . I noticed you changed your jeer already as I predicted . But you still didn't mention why you didn't call the wareham police either. Now you want me to call holly? Ragboy on the courier website you wrote a female who was fed up approached me , you wanted people to think a random person told you this story. You failed to mention she was an employee of yours. Why did you do that????? Why keep it a secret???? If you had nothing to hide why did you not mention that important fact???? You boy had better keep up with your lies better. Sorry I exposed you being a liar ragboy .
Offline
#5 2009-05-15 06:01:08
I HAVE TALKED TO SEVERAL PEOPLE AND ASKED THEM WHAT WORDS CAME UP WHEN YOU HEARD THE NAME SLAGER AND HER ARE SOME OF THEM ASSHOLE, PRICK,SHITHEAD , SCUMBAG,DICK,LIAR, FAT,NOBODY,SECTION 8,BALDING LEATHER,LAZY,BAGEL, SLOTH,GLUTONEY,ENVEY DEMOCRAT,FUCKIN ASSHOLE, HALIFAX PROJECTS DRUNK,SON OF A DRUNCK,NOT A PRIMARY BREAD WINNER, DOLL HEADS,BRUCE, WHAT WORDS COME UP WHEN YOU HERE THE WORD SLAGER. FRIGHT NING.
Offline
#6 2009-05-15 06:25:21
WHO IS THE BIGGEST ASS HOLE IN WAREHAM IS IT BRUCE ,BRENDA , OR SLAGER AND THE VOTES ARE IN AND ITS A TIE THEY ARE ALL ASS HOLES.
Offline
#7 2009-05-15 07:01:04
HAS ANYONE ELSE NOTICED A PATTERN WITH RAGBOY'S FABRICATIONS? FIRST THE CLAIM ABOUT THE DOLL HEADS THAT HE NEVER CALLED THE (WAREHAM) POLICE ABOUT. STILL WAITING FOR A RESPONSE TO THAT RAGBOY..... THEN HE FIRES ELIZABETH OVER A FIGHT OVER DOLLS. ARE YOU OBSESSED WITH DOLLS RAGBOY? WERE YOU DEPRIVED OF PLAYING WITH DOLLS FROM YOUR ALCOHOLIC FATHER?
Offline
#8 2009-05-15 07:22:25
bobbie where is the wiskey bottle,you are such a disapoiment to me i just need a drink ,can not stand to look at you , you have screwd up my life ,why dont you movt to wareham ma and screw up there lives , you have sure screwed up are lives,see ya fattey and dont let the door hit you on the way out. this is a coversation between slager and daddy.
Offline
#9 2009-05-15 10:59:09
WELL RAGBOY STILL WAITING FOR ANSWER TO MY QUESTION. DO YOU THINK THAT IF YOU IGNORE IT IT DIDNT HAPPEN? YOU KNOW WHY NOBODY BELIEVES YOUR TELLING THE TRUTH RAGBOY BECAUSE YOU INTIALLY TRIED TO COVER UP THE FACT THE WOMAN WAS IN FACT AN EMPLOYEE SO ANYTHING YOU SAY OR CONSTANTLY REWRITE OF YOU ARTICLES NOBODY BELIEVES. SORRY! BE A MAN RAGBOY
Offline
#10 2009-05-15 12:31:28
Yet another edit to the JEER....
IHATESLAGER - Why didn't I report the doll incident to the Halifax police? Because the incident happened in Wareham, you tool. I went above the Wareham police department because one of Mary Jane Pillsbury's sons is a police officer and the chief was one of her closest friends (as evidenced by the letter of support for her the chief sent me right after the incident). Keep trying, though. Each one of your hateful words further exposes who you are.
Thanks for once again proving to the good people of this town that the shortest distance between two points is your ears. The apple really doesn't fall from the tree, does it? And if you think I sent Holly to anyone's house, why don't you just pick up the phone and ask her? That would unravel your lies very quickly. You would discover she isn't an employee of this company (as you keep insisting) and that she went on her own, without my knowledge, because there are some people you just don't mess with. The fact that you refuse to call her to confirm this says it all. She's a 5-foot-1 inch juggernaut and you're a 300-pound weenie.
That's really all I have to say to you. Mary Jane Pillsbury never personally challenged a word I wrote about her while she was a selectman. I first reported this story nearly three years ago. Case closed. Now go get a life and stop obsessing over the lives of others. It's really pathetic.
Above the Wareham Police? I certainly hope he doesn't mean the Selectmen. They have no Police powers or judicial powers, so having them investigate anything is bullshit. It's also pretty bold to insinuate that the Police and Police Chief would violate their duties because they are friends with someone. I'm sure officers have friends and family in their lives, but it doesn't make them untouchable when it comes to crime. I say crime, not poems of Icarus.
For an objective reporter, you sure do add a lot of personal opinion. And to tell someone else to stop obsessing about other people lives.... priceless. Perhaps you should heed your own advise with this website!
Offline
#11 2009-05-15 13:13:58
OMG NOW I WILL ASK FOR THE PROOF RAGBOY. WHO DID YOU REPORT IT TO? THE CIA ? THE FBI? WHERE IS THE REPORT THAT WAS DONE? PUBLISH IT.. YOU WONT BECAUSE IT DOESNT EXIST BECAUSE THE INCIDENT NEVER HAPPENDED. ONLY IN YOUR PATHETIC LUNATIC CONSIPARCY THEORY LITTLE BRAIN OF YOURS. JESUS CHRIST SLAGER CANT YOU FUCKING FIGURE OUT WHO I AM??????????? WTF YOU ARE THE WORST INVESTGATIVE REPORTER THERE EVER WAS. OBVISIOUSLY YOU STILL THINK I AM SOMEONE ELSE. GOD DAM YOU ARE STUPID. SO A REWRITE AND YET ANOTHER ADDITION TO THE LIE. PROVE IT SLAGER WHO DID YOU REPORT IT TO? NO I WONT CALL HOLLY BECAUSE I HAVE ALREADY CAUGHT HER IN LIES ABOUT THE INCIDENT THAT YOU REPORT ON SO WHY WOULD I WASTE MY TIME. WHETHER SHE IS AN "EMPLOYEE" OR A CONTRIBUTOR" I DONT CARE YOU LIKE TO PLAY WITH WORDS I DONT. FACT OF THE MATTER IS SHE IS TIED WITH YOU. YOU ARE A BIG TOUGH GUY BEHIND A NEWSPAPER BUT IN REAL LIFE YOU SEND A "CONTRIBUTOR" TO SPEAK WITH A "WEENIE" . PLEASE STOP RAGBOY IM STARTING TO FEEL BAD FOR YOU. WHY ARE YOU NOT COMFORTABLE WITH YOUR STORIES. WHY THE CONSTANT "REWRITES" WHY DID YOU FAIL TO MENTION YOU KNEW THE WOMAN IN THE FIRST PLACE? WHY DID YOU MAKE IT SEEM IT WAS SOME CONCERED CITIZEN THAT APPROACHED YOU? (WHERE AT A CHINESE BUFFET?) YOUR FULL OF CRAP RAGBOY. AND YET ANOTHER QUOTE FROM THE PAST "I WILL WASTE NO MORE INK WRITING ABOUT HATEBLOGGERS" FROM LITTLE RAGBOY WHO SENDS 5'1'' FEMALES TO STAND UP FOR HIM PANTLOAD SLAGER.
Last edited by IHATESLAGER (2009-05-15 13:15:45)
Offline
#12 2009-05-15 14:10:15
COMMONSENSE IF HE SAYS ITS THE BOS IM GOING TO PISS MY PANTS. STILL WAITING RAGBOY. STILL THINKING OF WHAT TO SAY TO COVER YOUR LIES? ..........
Offline
#13 2009-05-15 16:16:09
I'll bet it was The Selectmen, but he says State Police. He's dumb enough to believe that they rule over the local police, and a lot of people believe that too. He does like to pray on the people that don't know any better. A lot of people don't realize one has nothing to do with the other in Massachusetts when it comes to a complaint like his. Why didn't he go "above" the PD for Icarus?
He's whole story is bullshit. If the doll thing happened, he said it happened "the day after" he printed the MJP article. Somehow, the Chief (with nothing better to do apparently) responded to the paper INSTANTLY defending MJP as a friend. So at this point Bob felt he has no choice but to go "above" the Wareham Police.
So the timeline (according to Rag Man) would be...
Thursday: 2pm Article hits newstands
Friday: Let's say he gets in the office at 10am, dolls on the front step.
Friday: 10:05 - went "above" the WPD about the incident
That puts the Chief's letter somewhere between Thursday 2pm and Friday morning, before the dolls arrive. That's a load of crap. The Chief would have to have been waiting for the paper delivery and read it instantly for that to happen.
More than likely (it has been quite a while), the Chief responded at least a week or more later. I remember reading it in the Courier.
Last edited by commonsense (2009-05-15 16:17:34)
Offline
#14 2009-05-15 16:21:46
Ragman meltdowns are always priceless.
Slagerhater, if you want a good laugh, pick up a copy of the paper rag. Ragman has a column where he says the proofreader is not his employee and then you peer your eyes down and boom, there's her name listed right there in the paper's masthead. All on the same page. Ragman, if people are nice enough to do your dirty work for you the least you can do is not throw them under the bus. Oh yeah more than that the least you can do is not send them to the wrong house. (P family once more, I cant say sorry enough)
Slagerhater, on the silly doll thing that nobody believes anyway so why bother arguing with the Ragboy - lets look at (to use a Ragman catchphrase) the verifiable facts:
Verifiable fact 1 - The Ragman says this doll thing happened when he called for MJP's resignation while he was at the Bulletin which was in early 2006. He did not launch the Rag until October 2006.
Verifiable fact 2 - The Ragman only first wrote about this doll thing in October of 2007, on the first anniversary column celebrating his first year of putting out his rag.
Now here's a thinker - the Ragman, who is well known for instantly updating his site within seconds after something pisses him off - anyone else have a hard time believing that silly doll thing occurred, that the Ragman would wait over a year and a half nearly 2 years to write about something like that?
An awfully long wait for someone who rushes to his computer to counter every insult from the hatebloggers - actually to use another ragman phrase, it "speaks volumes."
Last edited by Hamatron5000 (2009-05-15 17:05:53)
Offline
#15 2009-05-15 16:25:04
Also - would not reports have been made to CNC, since they rented the building, and to the landlord who owned it? Has anyone looked into that? Something like that happens at their building one would think they would have reported it to Wareham PD whether ragman wanted them to or not.
Offline
#16 2009-05-15 17:16:42
"I first reported this story nearly three years ago." says Ragman. Ragboy you first reported it in October 2007 in your first anniversary of the rag column. Verifiable fact. Three years ago would be May 2006 and in that time youd have been at the Bulletin. You never wrote a word about it at the Bulletin.
Offline
#17 2009-05-15 18:29:59
I know the story is false. Ragboy I'm not trying to hide the truth I'm asking for documentation of the incident that you don't want to provide because it never happened. I didn't see where he said the state police. That's ok I called the local barracks and they had no record of the incident either. Prove us wrong ragboy produce the report. I saw her name printed in the paper ham .... Laughable. We have proven once again ragboy is a liar. Enough said
Offline
#18 2009-05-15 19:15:03
HE MADE THE STORY UP ABOUTTHE DOLL HEADS PURE AND SIMPLE, AND I AM SURE HIS EMPLOYEE DIDNY GO TO THAT MAN HOUSE WITH OUT PRODDING FROM SLAGER , HE IS A DICK HEAD
Offline
#19 2009-05-15 22:12:20
The 5 foot 1 inch blonde barger-inner new employee (or not) isn't any better than the chimp at proof-reading the rag. Ragman writes " The apple really doesn't fall from the tree, does it?" New raggirl doesn't catch it...unless that is what the ragboy really means...maybe it is just one more of his distortions.
Last edited by binky (2009-05-15 22:15:14)
Offline
#20 2009-05-16 00:31:54
IF HE DID REPORT IT TO THE POLICE RAGBOY WOULD SETTLE THIS AND PRODUCE A REPORT OF THE INCIDENT. HE DOESNT SO THERE YOU HAVE IT. THE STORY WAS FABRICATED IN HIS HEAD . HE TELLS SO MANY LIES HE PROBABLY FORGETS WHAT THE TRUTH IS AND WHAT HIS LIES ARE .
Offline
#21 2009-05-16 06:35:30
SLAGER WAS FIRED FROM A PAPER FOR GETTING THE PAPER IN TO A LAWSUIT AND THE PAPER SETTLED OUT OF COURT, HE MAKES STORIES UP TO BRING IN RAEDERS HE DOES NO HAVE PROBLEM LIEING HE IS A LIARAND YOU ARE RITE MR I HATE SLAGER HA MADE THE STORY UP.
Last edited by ihateliz (2009-05-16 08:07:10)
Offline